Application value of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery during the second and third trimesters complicated with gynecological pelvic mass
The aim of the present retrospective cohort study was to compare the clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes and pregnancy outcomes of laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery, conventional laparoscopy (CL) surgery and transabdominal (TA) surgery for managing gynecological pelvic masses (GPMs) during the second (14–28 weeks) and third (> 28 weeks) trimesters. The study comprised patients who underwent surgical intervention (LESS, CL or TA surgery) for GPMs at Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Shannan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, and Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, between June 2018 and June 2023. Retrospective cohort study. Multicenter academic healthcare institutions. Patients undergoing surgical intervention for GPM at Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Shannan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, and Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, between June 2018 and June 2023. LESS, CL, or TA. Among the 59 patients (gestational age: 13–29 weeks, including one case of twin pregnancy), 16 underwent LESS surgery, 25 underwent CL surgery, and 18 underwent TA surgery. Compared to the TA group, the laparoscopic group (LESS and CL surgeries) had shorter operative times and bed rest durations, lower inflammatory markers, and a reduced length of hospital stay post-operation. The LESS surgery group was noted to have lower VAS pain scores and lower SCAR scores at one month post-surgery compared with the CL group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in infant growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes at one year of age among the three groups. The present study has shown that LESS surgery presents a safe and effective alternative for managing GPMs during the second and third trimesters, offering advantages in terms of postoperative recovery and scar appearance. Why this matters: The safety and benefits of LESS surgery for pelvic masses in pregnancy have been assessed. Key results: The key benefits were faster recovery, less pain, better scars vs. traditional methods and no harm caused to babies. Bottom line: A safe, minimally invasive option has become available for eligible patients.
Authors
- Lufang Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0324-6644)
- Yeshe Lhamo
- Shuai Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1107-6775)
- Jing Liao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9591-8070)
- Yi Shen
- Jun Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5049-5759)
- Zhuoma Laba
Institutions
- Union Hospital (HK)
- Wuhan University (CN)
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (CN)
- Wuhan Union Hospital (CN)
- Tibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital (CN)
- Union Hospital (CN)
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Surgery
- Published
- 2025-11-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03302-z
- Primary Topic
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology
- Tongji University
- Wuhan University
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology