Setting priorities for healthcare interventions in Indonesia: a comprehensive conceptual framework

Health priority setting is a fundamental aspect of public health decision-making in Indonesia, a country characterized by its vast geographic diversity, large population, and evolving healthcare challenges. Given the complex and varied health needs across the country, effective prioritization of healthcare interventions is essential for optimizing resource allocation and improving health outcomes. This study aims to explore the current healthcare priority-setting strategies in Indonesia and identify opportunities to enhance their implementation to support the achievement of universal health coverage (UHC). We conducted a narrative review of relevant literature using the medical databases PubMed and EMBASE, supplemented by a manual review of reference lists and key policy documents. Key findings reveal that the criteria for health intervention prioritization in Indonesia include disease burden, intervention effectiveness, cost, acceptability, and fairness. However, challenges persist in the consistent application of these criteria across Indonesia’s diverse regions, further compounded by disparities in infrastructure, governance, and data availability. In terms of healthcare priority setting, Indonesia combines technical approaches like Health Technology Assessment and Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis with value-based methods such as the Delphi Technique and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, focusing on equity, fairness, and stakeholder engagement. Limitations in current approaches for healthcare priority setting further complicate the process. Additionally, ethical and social considerations sometimes conflict with economic or technical priorities, underscoring the need for continuous evaluation and adaptation of health priority setting practices. These complexities highlight that while Indonesia has made significant strides, areas for improvement remain to ensure equitable and effective healthcare allocation. Using Indonesia as a reference case, this paper emphasizes the importance of integrating evidence-based priority setting within the framework of UHC to improve healthcare access and equity in Indonesia. This analysis equips stakeholders with the knowledge necessary to navigate Indonesia’s complex healthcare landscape and drive initiatives aimed at achieving better health outcomes and the well-being of its population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02668-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Setting priorities for healthcare interventions in Indonesia: a comprehensive conceptual framework

Maarten Jacobus Postma, Neily Zakiyah, Auliya A. Suwantika, Mohammed Alfaqeeh
1 citations
International Journal for Equity in Health
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
article

Setting priorities for healthcare interventions in Indonesia: a comprehensive conceptual framework

Maarten Jacobus Postma, Neily Zakiyah, Auliya A. Suwantika, Mohammed Alfaqeeh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Health priority setting is a fundamental aspect of public health decision-making in Indonesia, a country characterized by its vast geographic diversity, large population, and evolving healthcare challenges. Given the complex and varied health needs across the country, effective prioritization of healthcare interventions is essential for optimizing resource allocation and improving health outcomes. This study aims to explore the current healthcare priority-setting strategies in Indonesia and identify opportunities to enhance their implementation to support the achievement of universal health coverage (UHC). We conducted a narrative review of relevant literature using the medical databases PubMed and EMBASE, supplemented by a manual review of reference lists and key policy documents. Key findings reveal that the criteria for health intervention prioritization in Indonesia include disease burden, intervention effectiveness, cost, acceptability, and fairness. However, challenges persist in the consistent application of these criteria across Indonesia’s diverse regions, further compounded by disparities in infrastructure, governance, and data availability. In terms of healthcare priority setting, Indonesia combines technical approaches like Health Technology Assessment and Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis with value-based methods such as the Delphi Technique and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, focusing on equity, fairness, and stakeholder engagement. Limitations in current approaches for healthcare priority setting further complicate the process. Additionally, ethical and social considerations sometimes conflict with economic or technical priorities, underscoring the need for continuous evaluation and adaptation of health priority setting practices. These complexities highlight that while Indonesia has made significant strides, areas for improvement remain to ensure equitable and effective healthcare allocation. Using Indonesia as a reference case, this paper emphasizes the importance of integrating evidence-based priority setting within the framework of UHC to improve healthcare access and equity in Indonesia. This analysis equips stakeholders with the knowledge necessary to navigate Indonesia’s complex healthcare landscape and drive initiatives aimed at achieving better health outcomes and the well-being of its population.

International Journal for Equity in HealthVol. 24(1)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Padjadjaran University (ID)
Universitas Padjadjaran
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.