Geopower, <i>Geos</i> and the Colonisation of Palestine

ABSTRACT While the majority of geographical work on colonialism in Palestine centres on territory and land, this article foregrounds geopower and geos in the making of spatial relations. Three arguments are made over three corresponding sections. The first draws on recent writing on geopower and geos (primarily that by Elizabeth Grosz, Elizabeth Povinelli and Kathryn Yusoff) that addresses the idea that political order and subjectivities grow from geological formations and life/non‐life divisions. Following this work, I make an argument with obvious significance for geographers: the geos is a theoretically under‐explored spatial unit that may predicate manifold spatial relations (e.g., the practices and politics that produce ‘land’ or ‘territory’). The second section considers historical accounts of early Zionist and Israeli settlement to show how geopower underpins the conceptualisation of Palestinian space as alternatively life‐sustaining or life‐threatening in ways that predicate the sequester of land and territorial claims. The stakes are not merely historical or theoretical: the third section focuses on three contemporary sites—(i) the war‐affected soils of Gaza, (ii) the cultivation of olive trees in the West Bank (iii) and practices of agri‐resistance in Bethlehem—to explicate how geopower and geos remain central to ongoing colonial control and struggles in Palestine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.70049
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopower, Geos and the Colonisation of Palestine

Mark Griffiths
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

Geopower, Geos and the Colonisation of Palestine

Mark Griffiths
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT While the majority of geographical work on colonialism in Palestine centres on territory and land, this article foregrounds geopower and geos in the making of spatial relations. Three arguments are made over three corresponding sections. The first draws on recent writing on geopower and geos (primarily that by Elizabeth Grosz, Elizabeth Povinelli and Kathryn Yusoff) that addresses the idea that political order and subjectivities grow from geological formations and life/non‐life divisions. Following this work, I make an argument with obvious significance for geographers: the geos is a theoretically under‐explored spatial unit that may predicate manifold spatial relations (e.g., the practices and politics that produce ‘land’ or ‘territory’). The second section considers historical accounts of early Zionist and Israeli settlement to show how geopower underpins the conceptualisation of Palestinian space as alternatively life‐sustaining or life‐threatening in ways that predicate the sequester of land and territorial claims. The stakes are not merely historical or theoretical: the third section focuses on three contemporary sites—(i) the war‐affected soils of Gaza, (ii) the cultivation of olive trees in the West Bank (iii) and practices of agri‐resistance in Bethlehem—to explicate how geopower and geos remain central to ongoing colonial control and struggles in Palestine.

Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.