Validation of Body Surface Area Equations for Estimating Fat-Free Mass by Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Regional Chilean Sample Aged 4 to 85 Years

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Body surface area (BSA) is an important metric that represents human dimensionality and could provide a more accurate representation of body composition. The objectives were (a) to verify the validity of a set of equations based on BSA to estimate lean body mass (LBM), using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference method and (b) to propose reference values of BSA by anthropometry and LBM by DXA in a regional sample of Chile aged 4 to 85 years. <b>Methods:</b> A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed. The sample size was 5493 participants. Weight and height were measured. BSA was calculated using seven equations. LBM was assessed by DXA. <b>Results:</b> Only three BSA equations (Dubois-Dubois, 1916, Fujimoto, Watanabe, 1969, and Mattar, 1981) best explained LBM. The explanatory power for males was R<sup>2</sup> = 83 to 84%, and that for females was R<sup>2</sup> = 69%. The standard error of estimation (SEE) of the three equations showed acceptable values in both sexes. These values ranged from 0.049 to 0.080 in males and from 0.035 to 0.088 in females. The Bland-Altman concordance analysis showed adequate limits of agreement. In men, they ranged from -0.092 to 0.069 m<sup>2</sup>. In females, they ranged from -0.064 to 0.084 m<sup>2</sup>. Reference values for BSA and LBM were constructed using percentiles. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study demonstrated the validity of three equations for estimating LBM in a Chilean sample aged between 4 and 85 years. These results show consistent behavior and acceptable accuracy, especially in the Mattar equation for all ages. However, the Dubois & Dubois and Fujimoto equations could also be an alternative in females. Reference values were generated for BSA and LBM according to age and sex. The results suggest their applicability and usefulness in clinical and public health contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15232982
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of Body Surface Area Equations for Estimating Fat-Free Mass by Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Regional Chilean Sample Aged 4 to 85 Years

Rossana Gómez‐Campos, Lucila Sanchez‐Macedo, Fernando Alvear-Vasquez, Marco Cossio‐Bolaños et al.
Diagnostics
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
article

Validation of Body Surface Area Equations for Estimating Fat-Free Mass by Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Regional Chilean Sample Aged 4 to 85 Years

Rossana Gómez‐Campos, Lucila Sanchez‐Macedo, Fernando Alvear-Vasquez, Marco Cossio‐Bolaños, Miguel de Arruda, Rubén Vidal Espinoza, José Sulla-Torres, Evandro Lázari, Camilo Urra-Albornoz
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Body surface area (BSA) is an important metric that represents human dimensionality and could provide a more accurate representation of body composition. The objectives were (a) to verify the validity of a set of equations based on BSA to estimate lean body mass (LBM), using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference method and (b) to propose reference values of BSA by anthropometry and LBM by DXA in a regional sample of Chile aged 4 to 85 years. <b>Methods:</b> A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed. The sample size was 5493 participants. Weight and height were measured. BSA was calculated using seven equations. LBM was assessed by DXA. <b>Results:</b> Only three BSA equations (Dubois-Dubois, 1916, Fujimoto, Watanabe, 1969, and Mattar, 1981) best explained LBM. The explanatory power for males was R<sup>2</sup> = 83 to 84%, and that for females was R<sup>2</sup> = 69%. The standard error of estimation (SEE) of the three equations showed acceptable values in both sexes. These values ranged from 0.049 to 0.080 in males and from 0.035 to 0.088 in females. The Bland-Altman concordance analysis showed adequate limits of agreement. In men, they ranged from -0.092 to 0.069 m<sup>2</sup>. In females, they ranged from -0.064 to 0.084 m<sup>2</sup>. Reference values for BSA and LBM were constructed using percentiles. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study demonstrated the validity of three equations for estimating LBM in a Chilean sample aged between 4 and 85 years. These results show consistent behavior and acceptable accuracy, especially in the Mattar equation for all ages. However, the Dubois & Dubois and Fujimoto equations could also be an alternative in females. Reference values were generated for BSA and LBM according to age and sex. The results suggest their applicability and usefulness in clinical and public health contexts.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(23)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Catholic University of the Maule (CL), Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez (CL), Catholic University of Santa María (PE), Universidad Santo Tomás (CL), Universidad Nacional del Altiplano (PE), Departamento de Educación (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.