Comparison of Echocardiography and Invasive Transseptal Catheterization for Assessing Transvalvular Gradient in Patients with Surgical Aortic Valve Prostheses: Fact or Myth?

<b>Background:</b> Echocardiography is the primary assessment tool for follow-up in patients with aortic valve prostheses. However, there are concerns regarding the consistency between echocardiographic and invasive transvalvular gradients (TVGs). This study utilized both noninvasive and invasive methods to compare the TVGs in aortic valve prostheses. <b>Methods:</b> The study included fourteen patients who had previously undergone surgical aortic valve replacement [metallic (<i>n</i> = 12) and bioprosthetic (<i>n</i> = 2)]. All patients had moderate-to-severe TVGs, which were measured during follow-up echocardiography, and they underwent invasive transseptal catheterization. Invasive and echocardiographic TVGs were measured and compared. <b>Results:</b> The median interval between index valvular surgery and invasive TVG measurement was 6.7 (2.5-11.5) years. The median interval between echocardiographic and invasive TVG measurements was 7.2 (2-19) days. Only 12 (85.7%) patients were symptomatic during echocardiographic assessment. Maximum TVGs obtained by echocardiography were higher than invasive peak-to-peak TVGs (77.0 ± 13.1 vs. 47.5 ± 21.7 mmHg, <i>p</i> < 0.05). There was a significant negative correlation between the echocardiography-based aortic valve area and the effective orifice area index with the catheter-based peak-to-peak aortic gradient (r = -0.64, <i>p</i> = 0.014 and r = -0.63, <i>p</i> = 0.015). Six patients (42.9%) who revealed severe catheter-based peak-to-peak aortic gradient underwent redo aortic valve surgeries. The cut-off value of EOAI of <0.50 cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup> was found to be a predictor of severe catheter-based peak-to-peak aortic gradient. <b>Conclusions:</b> In our preliminary cohort study, the TVGs of aortic valvular prostheses measured by echocardiography were significantly greater than those measured by invasive transseptal catheterization. During follow-up, invasive confirmation of echocardiographic moderate-to-severe TVGs in selected patients with surgical aortic valvular prostheses may be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15232980
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Echocardiography and Invasive Transseptal Catheterization for Assessing Transvalvular Gradient in Patients with Surgical Aortic Valve Prostheses: Fact or Myth?

Kudret Aytemir, Uğur Nadir Karakulak, Uğur Canpolat, L. Şahiner et al.
Diagnostics
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Comparison of Echocardiography and Invasive Transseptal Catheterization for Assessing Transvalvular Gradient in Patients with Surgical Aortic Valve Prostheses: Fact or Myth?

Kudret Aytemir, Uğur Nadir Karakulak, Uğur Canpolat, L. Şahiner, Ahmet Kıvrak, Mert Doğan, Can Menemencioğlu, Ahmet Hakan Ateş, S. Kilic, Ergün Barış Kaya
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Echocardiography is the primary assessment tool for follow-up in patients with aortic valve prostheses. However, there are concerns regarding the consistency between echocardiographic and invasive transvalvular gradients (TVGs). This study utilized both noninvasive and invasive methods to compare the TVGs in aortic valve prostheses. <b>Methods:</b> The study included fourteen patients who had previously undergone surgical aortic valve replacement [metallic (<i>n</i> = 12) and bioprosthetic (<i>n</i> = 2)]. All patients had moderate-to-severe TVGs, which were measured during follow-up echocardiography, and they underwent invasive transseptal catheterization. Invasive and echocardiographic TVGs were measured and compared. <b>Results:</b> The median interval between index valvular surgery and invasive TVG measurement was 6.7 (2.5-11.5) years. The median interval between echocardiographic and invasive TVG measurements was 7.2 (2-19) days. Only 12 (85.7%) patients were symptomatic during echocardiographic assessment. Maximum TVGs obtained by echocardiography were higher than invasive peak-to-peak TVGs (77.0 ± 13.1 vs. 47.5 ± 21.7 mmHg, <i>p</i> < 0.05). There was a significant negative correlation between the echocardiography-based aortic valve area and the effective orifice area index with the catheter-based peak-to-peak aortic gradient (r = -0.64, <i>p</i> = 0.014 and r = -0.63, <i>p</i> = 0.015). Six patients (42.9%) who revealed severe catheter-based peak-to-peak aortic gradient underwent redo aortic valve surgeries. The cut-off value of EOAI of <0.50 cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup> was found to be a predictor of severe catheter-based peak-to-peak aortic gradient. <b>Conclusions:</b> In our preliminary cohort study, the TVGs of aortic valvular prostheses measured by echocardiography were significantly greater than those measured by invasive transseptal catheterization. During follow-up, invasive confirmation of echocardiographic moderate-to-severe TVGs in selected patients with surgical aortic valvular prostheses may be considered.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(23)
Hacettepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.