Turbulent coherent structures, from taxonomy to engineering

Abstract This review synthesises contemporary understanding and engineering applications of turbulent coherent structures (TCS) in boundary layer flows and evaluates a spectrum of active and passive control techniques. We begin by classifying seven TCS “species”–from wall streaks and quasi-streamwise vortices to hairpin vortices, vortex packets, super-streaks, temperature ramps, and thermal roll-cells–detailing their characteristic scales, formation cycles, and mutual interactions. Two self-sustaining cycles, confined, respectively, to the near-wall (inner) and outer regions, are presented alongside mechanisms of interscale modulation, including amplitude and frequency modulation and generation excitation. Building on this physical framework, we review control methods that target specific TCS, covering compliant coatings, riblets, blowing/suction, spanwise wall oscillations, polymer additives, plasma actuators, and thermal actuation. For each, we discuss the governing mechanism, practical implementation, predictive correlations, and performance criteria, highlighting common signatures of effective inner-cycle disruption (e.g., reduced Reynolds stress, thicker viscous layers, extended hibernation periods), and outer layer actuation strategies suited to high–Reynolds number flows. We conclude by comparing net energy savings–typically limited to about 10% and outlining two promising research directions: hybrid control schemes and theory-guided optimisation. Finally, we emphasise that successful drag reduction hinges on a deep, cycle-level understanding of TCS dynamics and their response to control inputs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-025-05968-1
Primary Topic
Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turbulent coherent structures, from taxonomy to engineering

Eslam Reda Lotfy, Mohamed Ali Bakry, Hassan Sherif Elplpese
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
article

Turbulent coherent structures, from taxonomy to engineering

Eslam Reda Lotfy, Mohamed Ali Bakry, Hassan Sherif Elplpese
article en

Abstract

Abstract This review synthesises contemporary understanding and engineering applications of turbulent coherent structures (TCS) in boundary layer flows and evaluates a spectrum of active and passive control techniques. We begin by classifying seven TCS “species”–from wall streaks and quasi-streamwise vortices to hairpin vortices, vortex packets, super-streaks, temperature ramps, and thermal roll-cells–detailing their characteristic scales, formation cycles, and mutual interactions. Two self-sustaining cycles, confined, respectively, to the near-wall (inner) and outer regions, are presented alongside mechanisms of interscale modulation, including amplitude and frequency modulation and generation excitation. Building on this physical framework, we review control methods that target specific TCS, covering compliant coatings, riblets, blowing/suction, spanwise wall oscillations, polymer additives, plasma actuators, and thermal actuation. For each, we discuss the governing mechanism, practical implementation, predictive correlations, and performance criteria, highlighting common signatures of effective inner-cycle disruption (e.g., reduced Reynolds stress, thicker viscous layers, extended hibernation periods), and outer layer actuation strategies suited to high–Reynolds number flows. We conclude by comparing net energy savings–typically limited to about 10% and outlining two promising research directions: hybrid control schemes and theory-guided optimisation. Finally, we emphasise that successful drag reduction hinges on a deep, cycle-level understanding of TCS dynamics and their response to control inputs.

Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and EngineeringVol. 48(1)
Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (EG), Alexandria University (EG)
Science and Technology Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.