Heat Extraction Optimization of Well Clusters for Hydrothermal Reservoir Development

In recent years, hydrothermal geothermal resources have been predominantly exploited through well cluster systems, achieving extensive commercial implementation. The efficient development of such systems remains critically dependent on the comprehensive characterization of regional geological conditions, as multiple subsurface parameters—including stratal thickness, structural relief, porosity–permeability distribution, and fault architecture—exert substantial control over reservoir performance. However, the effective integration of these geological factors to optimize well network configurations, balancing economic viability, power output, and other evaluation metrics to enhance heat extraction efficiency and delay thermal breakthrough, remains unresolved. This study aimed to identify the optimal well cluster for hydrothermal geothermal resources in the X region. Geological, drilling, and well-logging data were compiled to construct a region-specific geological model. A coupled numerical model of fluid flow and heat transfer was developed for a five-spot well pattern. System performances under two commonly applied injection-to-production ratios (2:3 and 1:4) and spatial configurations between injection and production wells were quantified. A multi-criteria evaluation framework integrating heat extraction power, injection–production pressure difference, and production temperature decline was implemented to holistically assess well cluster. An integrated weighting strategy combining subjective expertise and objective analytical criteria was implemented alongside the TOPSIS method to systematically identify the optimal wellfield configuration. Results demonstrate that Pattern 11, comprising three injection wells and two production wells, achieved superior comprehensive performance among 15 patterns, with heat extraction power 24.13 MW, and production temperature decline <1 °C and injection–production pressure difference <3 MPa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123791
Primary Topic
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heat Extraction Optimization of Well Clusters for Hydrothermal Reservoir Development

Gaosheng Wang, Shuang Li, Qiliang Cui, Junlin Yi et al.
Processes
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
article

Heat Extraction Optimization of Well Clusters for Hydrothermal Reservoir Development

Gaosheng Wang, Shuang Li, Qiliang Cui, Junlin Yi, Weijun Qian, Jialin Zhao, Xiangchun Li
article en

Abstract

In recent years, hydrothermal geothermal resources have been predominantly exploited through well cluster systems, achieving extensive commercial implementation. The efficient development of such systems remains critically dependent on the comprehensive characterization of regional geological conditions, as multiple subsurface parameters—including stratal thickness, structural relief, porosity–permeability distribution, and fault architecture—exert substantial control over reservoir performance. However, the effective integration of these geological factors to optimize well network configurations, balancing economic viability, power output, and other evaluation metrics to enhance heat extraction efficiency and delay thermal breakthrough, remains unresolved. This study aimed to identify the optimal well cluster for hydrothermal geothermal resources in the X region. Geological, drilling, and well-logging data were compiled to construct a region-specific geological model. A coupled numerical model of fluid flow and heat transfer was developed for a five-spot well pattern. System performances under two commonly applied injection-to-production ratios (2:3 and 1:4) and spatial configurations between injection and production wells were quantified. A multi-criteria evaluation framework integrating heat extraction power, injection–production pressure difference, and production temperature decline was implemented to holistically assess well cluster. An integrated weighting strategy combining subjective expertise and objective analytical criteria was implemented alongside the TOPSIS method to systematically identify the optimal wellfield configuration. Results demonstrate that Pattern 11, comprising three injection wells and two production wells, achieved superior comprehensive performance among 15 patterns, with heat extraction power 24.13 MW, and production temperature decline <1 °C and injection–production pressure difference <3 MPa.

ProcessesVol. 13(12)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), China Energy Engineering Corporation (China) (CN)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing, China National Offshore Oil Corporation
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.