Landslide Susceptibility Prediction and Driving Force Analysis Integrating Machine Learning and Spatial Factor Optimization: A Case Study in the Guanyinyan Hydropower Station Reservoir Area

ABSTRACT Landslides are complex geological hazards driven by the interaction of multiple factors, exhibiting significant spatial heterogeneity. Although machine learning has made notable progress in landslide susceptibility prediction, most models still rely on expert knowledge or fixed rules for feature discretization, limiting their adaptability across scales and spatial expressiveness. To address the aforementioned issues, this study introduces the optimal parameters‐based geographical detector (OPGD) to determine the optimal classification intervals for environmental factors, which are then coupled with six machine learning models, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), K‐nearest neighbors (KNN), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) to predict landslide susceptibility in the Guanyinyan hydropower station reservoir area. Additionally, the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) is employed to further identify the key driving factors and their nonlinear response characteristics. The results show that (1) the optimal classification of 15 factors into 7–9 categories yields the highest spatial heterogeneity explanatory power, significantly improving the representation of landslide spatial patterns; (2) RF and SVM models outperform others, with training AUC values above 0.90 and high‐risk zones covering 24.87% and 23.21% of the study area, respectively; (3) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), human footprint index (HFI), distance to waters (DTWs), and elevation (ELE) emerge as the dominant drivers. NDVI is negatively associated with landslide risk, while HFI, DTW, and ELE show positive associations, revealing a compound mechanism shaped by topographic, ecological, and anthropogenic interactions. The framework developed in this study balances the objectivity of factor representation, the stability of model prediction, and the interpretability of the underlying mechanisms, effectively supporting spatial identification of landslide risks in similar regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70331
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Landslide Susceptibility Prediction and Driving Force Analysis Integrating Machine Learning and Spatial Factor Optimization: A Case Study in the Guanyinyan Hydropower Station Reservoir Area

Shi Qi, Jinlin Lai
1 citations
Land Degradation and Development
Landslides and related hazards
2.42
article

Landslide Susceptibility Prediction and Driving Force Analysis Integrating Machine Learning and Spatial Factor Optimization: A Case Study in the Guanyinyan Hydropower Station Reservoir Area

Shi Qi, Jinlin Lai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Landslides are complex geological hazards driven by the interaction of multiple factors, exhibiting significant spatial heterogeneity. Although machine learning has made notable progress in landslide susceptibility prediction, most models still rely on expert knowledge or fixed rules for feature discretization, limiting their adaptability across scales and spatial expressiveness. To address the aforementioned issues, this study introduces the optimal parameters‐based geographical detector (OPGD) to determine the optimal classification intervals for environmental factors, which are then coupled with six machine learning models, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), K‐nearest neighbors (KNN), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) to predict landslide susceptibility in the Guanyinyan hydropower station reservoir area. Additionally, the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) is employed to further identify the key driving factors and their nonlinear response characteristics. The results show that (1) the optimal classification of 15 factors into 7–9 categories yields the highest spatial heterogeneity explanatory power, significantly improving the representation of landslide spatial patterns; (2) RF and SVM models outperform others, with training AUC values above 0.90 and high‐risk zones covering 24.87% and 23.21% of the study area, respectively; (3) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), human footprint index (HFI), distance to waters (DTWs), and elevation (ELE) emerge as the dominant drivers. NDVI is negatively associated with landslide risk, while HFI, DTW, and ELE show positive associations, revealing a compound mechanism shaped by topographic, ecological, and anthropogenic interactions. The framework developed in this study balances the objectivity of factor representation, the stability of model prediction, and the interpretability of the underlying mechanisms, effectively supporting spatial identification of landslide risks in similar regions.

Land Degradation and Development
Beijing Forestry University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Landslides and related hazards
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.