The impact of lead underwriter ranking on the offer price revision of IPO firms: Evidence from the US

This paper examines the effect of lead underwriter ranking on the offer price revision of IPO (initial public offering) firms from the perspective of underwriter quality. Using the offer price revision from the SDC (Securities Data Company) in the US and a sample of 2,188 IPOs from 1990 to 2019, we find that the offer price revision of IPO is positively associated with high-ranked lead underwriters, while negatively related to low-ranked lead underwriters. Additional analysis suggests that IPO underpricing has a positive relation with high-ranked lead underwriters but no relation with low-ranked lead underwriters. Moreover, our study reveals that IPO underwritten by low-ranked underwriters raise significantly lower amounts in IPO and have poorer long-run performance. © 2025 The Author(s). Co-published by NISC Pty (Ltd) and Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Investment Analysts Journal
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2025.2578128
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of lead underwriter ranking on the offer price revision of IPO firms: Evidence from the US

Kazi Md. Tarique, Omar Al Farooque, Abu Chowdhury
Investment Analysts Journal
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

The impact of lead underwriter ranking on the offer price revision of IPO firms: Evidence from the US

Kazi Md. Tarique, Omar Al Farooque, Abu Chowdhury
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of lead underwriter ranking on the offer price revision of IPO (initial public offering) firms from the perspective of underwriter quality. Using the offer price revision from the SDC (Securities Data Company) in the US and a sample of 2,188 IPOs from 1990 to 2019, we find that the offer price revision of IPO is positively associated with high-ranked lead underwriters, while negatively related to low-ranked lead underwriters. Additional analysis suggests that IPO underpricing has a positive relation with high-ranked lead underwriters but no relation with low-ranked lead underwriters. Moreover, our study reveals that IPO underwritten by low-ranked underwriters raise significantly lower amounts in IPO and have poorer long-run performance. © 2025 The Author(s). Co-published by NISC Pty (Ltd) and Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Investment Analysts Journal
University of Turku (FI), University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh (BD), University of New England (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of lead underwriter ranking on the offer price revision of IPO firms: Evidence from the US — Kazi Md. Tarique, Omar Al Farooque, et al. · Investment Analysts Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS