Intangible Cultural Heritage differently exposed across continents

Abstract This study investigates the characteristics and patterns of various kinds of threats to Intangible Cultural Heritage. Data originate from the UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage database, which, besides the 796 inscriptions, holds 863 threats across the world since 2008. One out of five Intangible Heritage elements is identified as threatened, most commonly due to a lack of practice or transmission across generations or socioeconomic aspects. Environmental hazards are seldom identified as threats. Based on Probit and count data models, the results reveal that the likelihood and number of threats are mainly associated with geographic location and the year of inscription. Intangible Heritage in Europe and North America is the least exposed, while the opposite situation prevails in Africa. Early additions to the safeguarding list are more threatened. Once a threat has been identified, it rarely occurs in isolation, with internal and socio-economic threats being the most common pairings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Heritage Science
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-02169-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intangible Cultural Heritage differently exposed across continents

Martin Falk, Eva Hagsten
2 citations
npj Heritage Science
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
16.55
article

Intangible Cultural Heritage differently exposed across continents

Martin Falk, Eva Hagsten
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the characteristics and patterns of various kinds of threats to Intangible Cultural Heritage. Data originate from the UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage database, which, besides the 796 inscriptions, holds 863 threats across the world since 2008. One out of five Intangible Heritage elements is identified as threatened, most commonly due to a lack of practice or transmission across generations or socioeconomic aspects. Environmental hazards are seldom identified as threats. Based on Probit and count data models, the results reveal that the likelihood and number of threats are mainly associated with geographic location and the year of inscription. Intangible Heritage in Europe and North America is the least exposed, while the opposite situation prevails in Africa. Early additions to the safeguarding list are more threatened. Once a threat has been identified, it rarely occurs in isolation, with internal and socio-economic threats being the most common pairings.

npj Heritage ScienceVol. 13(1)
Södertörn University (SE), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
16.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intangible Cultural Heritage differently exposed across continents — Martin Falk, Eva Hagsten · npj Heritage Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS