Ensemble random forest for tropical cyclone tracking

Abstract. Even though tropical cyclones (TCs) are well documented during the intense part of their lifecycle until they weaken, many physical and statistical properties governing them are not well captured by gridded reanalysis or simulated by Earth System Models. Thus, tracking TCs remains a matter of interest for investigating observed and simulated tropical cyclones. Two types of cyclone tracking schemes are available. On the one hand, some trackers rely on physical and dynamical properties of the TCs and user-prescribed thresholds, which make them rigid. They need numerous variables that are not always available in the models. On the other hand, trackers leaning on deep learning need, by nature, large amounts of data and computing power. Besides, given the number of physical variables required for the tracking, they can be prone to overfitting, which hinders their transferability to climate models. This study explores the ability of a Random Forest (RF) approach to track TCs with a limited number of aggregated variables. Our analysis focuses on the Eastern North Pacific and North Atlantic basins, for which 514 and 431 observed tropical cyclone track records are available from the IBTrACS database during the 1980–2021 period. For each 6-hourly time step, RF associates TC occurrence or absence (1 or 0) to atmospheric situations described by predictors extracted from the ERA5 reanalysis. Hence, the tracking is considered a binary supervised classification problem of TC-free (zero) and TC (one) situations. Then, situations with TC occurrences are stitched to reconstruct TC trajectories. Results show the good ability and performance of this method for tracking tropical cyclones over both basins and good temporal and spatial generalisation. RF has a similar TC detection rate as trackers based on TCs' properties and a significantly lower false alarm rate. RF allows us to detect TC situations for diverse predictor combinations, which brings more flexibility than threshold-based trackers. Last but not least, this study sheds light on the most relevant variables for tropical cyclone detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4655-2025
Primary Topic
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ensemble random forest for tropical cyclone tracking

Stella Bourdin, Pradeebane Vaittinada Ayar, Mathieu Vrac, Davide Faranda
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
article

Ensemble random forest for tropical cyclone tracking

Stella Bourdin, Pradeebane Vaittinada Ayar, Mathieu Vrac, Davide Faranda
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Even though tropical cyclones (TCs) are well documented during the intense part of their lifecycle until they weaken, many physical and statistical properties governing them are not well captured by gridded reanalysis or simulated by Earth System Models. Thus, tracking TCs remains a matter of interest for investigating observed and simulated tropical cyclones. Two types of cyclone tracking schemes are available. On the one hand, some trackers rely on physical and dynamical properties of the TCs and user-prescribed thresholds, which make them rigid. They need numerous variables that are not always available in the models. On the other hand, trackers leaning on deep learning need, by nature, large amounts of data and computing power. Besides, given the number of physical variables required for the tracking, they can be prone to overfitting, which hinders their transferability to climate models. This study explores the ability of a Random Forest (RF) approach to track TCs with a limited number of aggregated variables. Our analysis focuses on the Eastern North Pacific and North Atlantic basins, for which 514 and 431 observed tropical cyclone track records are available from the IBTrACS database during the 1980–2021 period. For each 6-hourly time step, RF associates TC occurrence or absence (1 or 0) to atmospheric situations described by predictors extracted from the ERA5 reanalysis. Hence, the tracking is considered a binary supervised classification problem of TC-free (zero) and TC (one) situations. Then, situations with TC occurrences are stitched to reconstruct TC trajectories. Results show the good ability and performance of this method for tracking tropical cyclones over both basins and good temporal and spatial generalisation. RF has a similar TC detection rate as trackers based on TCs' properties and a significantly lower false alarm rate. RF allows us to detect TC situations for diverse predictor combinations, which brings more flexibility than threshold-based trackers. Last but not least, this study sheds light on the most relevant variables for tropical cyclone detection.

Natural hazards and earth system sciencesVol. 25(11)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), École Polytechnique (FR), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), University of Oxford (GB), Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), London Mathematical Laboratory (GB)
National Science Foundation, European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Lausanne, Université Paris-Saclay, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.