Job satisfaction, mental health, and workplace well-being of community health workers: a cross-sectional study

Community health workers (CHWs) are increasingly recognized as essential to the public health workforce, yet little is known about CHWs’ workplace well-being. We examined CHWs’ job satisfaction, mental health, and workplace experiences. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of CHWs across the state of New Jersey. Job satisfaction was measured using an adapted version of the Multi-Dimensional Motivation Scale for Community Health Workers with scores ranging from − 2 to 2 on dimensions of quality of supervision, feeling valued & capacitated, peer respect & support, and compensation & workload. Mental health was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). We also examined positive and negative work experiences, including accomplishments, skill learning, career growth, stress, bullying, and discrimination using items on a 5-point Likert Scale. A descriptive analysis was conducted. 52 CHWs completed the survey (69% female; 46% Hispanic, 27% non-Hispanic Black, 21% non-Hispanic White). Median (interquartile range) scores indicated high degree of satisfaction for quality of supervision [1.0 (0.9 to 1.9)], feeling valued [1.3 (0.9 to 1.7)], and peer support [1.4 (1 to 2)], but lower satisfaction for compensation and workload [0.4 (-0.4 to 1.2)]. Nearly all participants agreed or strongly agreed that their job gave them a chance to learn new skills (90%), however only 61% believed their job provided opportunities for advancement. Among participants, 23% reported typically feeling stressed out during the workday, 21% felt emotionally drained from their work, and 10% indicated that their job negatively impacted their mental health. PHQ-4 scores indicated that 12% had a positive depression screen and 16% had a positive anxiety screen. 15% reported ever having been subjected to workplace bullying and 21% had experienced workplace discrimination. CHWs’ overall job satisfaction was high. However, dissatisfaction with compensation, lack of opportunities for advancement and job-related stress were prominent challenges. Research is needed to identify and evaluate policies to improve CHW job conditions and promote workplace well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25546-3
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Job satisfaction, mental health, and workplace well-being of community health workers: a cross-sectional study

Leslie M. Kantor, Sang Hee Won, Slawa Rokicki, Ngozi Okafor et al.
BMC Public Health
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
article

Job satisfaction, mental health, and workplace well-being of community health workers: a cross-sectional study

Leslie M. Kantor, Sang Hee Won, Slawa Rokicki, Ngozi Okafor, Karen Farrior
article en

Abstract

Community health workers (CHWs) are increasingly recognized as essential to the public health workforce, yet little is known about CHWs’ workplace well-being. We examined CHWs’ job satisfaction, mental health, and workplace experiences. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of CHWs across the state of New Jersey. Job satisfaction was measured using an adapted version of the Multi-Dimensional Motivation Scale for Community Health Workers with scores ranging from − 2 to 2 on dimensions of quality of supervision, feeling valued & capacitated, peer respect & support, and compensation & workload. Mental health was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). We also examined positive and negative work experiences, including accomplishments, skill learning, career growth, stress, bullying, and discrimination using items on a 5-point Likert Scale. A descriptive analysis was conducted. 52 CHWs completed the survey (69% female; 46% Hispanic, 27% non-Hispanic Black, 21% non-Hispanic White). Median (interquartile range) scores indicated high degree of satisfaction for quality of supervision [1.0 (0.9 to 1.9)], feeling valued [1.3 (0.9 to 1.7)], and peer support [1.4 (1 to 2)], but lower satisfaction for compensation and workload [0.4 (-0.4 to 1.2)]. Nearly all participants agreed or strongly agreed that their job gave them a chance to learn new skills (90%), however only 61% believed their job provided opportunities for advancement. Among participants, 23% reported typically feeling stressed out during the workday, 21% felt emotionally drained from their work, and 10% indicated that their job negatively impacted their mental health. PHQ-4 scores indicated that 12% had a positive depression screen and 16% had a positive anxiety screen. 15% reported ever having been subjected to workplace bullying and 21% had experienced workplace discrimination. CHWs’ overall job satisfaction was high. However, dissatisfaction with compensation, lack of opportunities for advancement and job-related stress were prominent challenges. Research is needed to identify and evaluate policies to improve CHW job conditions and promote workplace well-being.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), New Jersey Department of Health (US), Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute (US), ABS Consulting (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.