In Silico Clinical Trials in Drug Development: A Systematic Review

In the context of clinical research, computational models have received increasing attention over the past decades. In this systematic review, we aimed to provide an overview of the role of so-called in silico clinical trials (ISCTs) in medical applications. Exemplary for the broad field of clinical medicine, we focused on in silico (IS) methods applied in drug development, sometimes also referred to as model informed drug development (MIDD). We searched PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov for published articles and registered clinical trials related to ISCTs. We identified 202 articles and 48 trials, and of these, 76 articles and 19 trials were directly linked to drug development. We extracted information from all 202 articles and 48 clinical trials and conducted a more detailed review of the methods used in the 76 articles that are connected to drug development. Regarding application, most articles and trials focused on cancer and imaging-related research while rare and pediatric diseases were only addressed in 14 articles and 5 trials, respectively. While some models were informed combining mechanistic knowledge with clinical or preclinical (in-vivo or in-vitro) data, the majority of models were fully data-driven, illustrating that clinical data is a crucial part in the process of generating synthetic data in ISCTs. Regarding reproducibility, a more detailed analysis revealed that only 24% (18 out of 76) of the articles provided an open-source implementation of the applied models, and in only 20% of the articles the generated synthetic data were publicly available. Despite the widely raised interest, we also found that it is still uncommon for ISCTs to be part of a registered clinical trial and their application is restricted to specific diseases leaving potential benefits of ISCTs not fully exploited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00893-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Silico Clinical Trials in Drug Development: A Systematic Review

Sebastian Weber, Moreno Ursino, Martin Posch, Marc Vandemeulebroecke et al.
2 citations
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
5.26
article

In Silico Clinical Trials in Drug Development: A Systematic Review

Sebastian Weber, Moreno Ursino, Martin Posch, Marc Vandemeulebroecke, Daria Julkowska, Marina Savelieva, Andrew C. Hooker, Christian Röver, Markus C. Elze, Anne‐Sophie Jannot, Emmanuelle Comets, Tim Friede, Sarah Zohar, Joanna IntHout, Nigel Stallard, Yanis Mimouni, Bohua Chen, L Schneider
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In the context of clinical research, computational models have received increasing attention over the past decades. In this systematic review, we aimed to provide an overview of the role of so-called in silico clinical trials (ISCTs) in medical applications. Exemplary for the broad field of clinical medicine, we focused on in silico (IS) methods applied in drug development, sometimes also referred to as model informed drug development (MIDD). We searched PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov for published articles and registered clinical trials related to ISCTs. We identified 202 articles and 48 trials, and of these, 76 articles and 19 trials were directly linked to drug development. We extracted information from all 202 articles and 48 clinical trials and conducted a more detailed review of the methods used in the 76 articles that are connected to drug development. Regarding application, most articles and trials focused on cancer and imaging-related research while rare and pediatric diseases were only addressed in 14 articles and 5 trials, respectively. While some models were informed combining mechanistic knowledge with clinical or preclinical (in-vivo or in-vitro) data, the majority of models were fully data-driven, illustrating that clinical data is a crucial part in the process of generating synthetic data in ISCTs. Regarding reproducibility, a more detailed analysis revealed that only 24% (18 out of 76) of the articles provided an open-source implementation of the applied models, and in only 20% of the articles the generated synthetic data were publicly available. Despite the widely raised interest, we also found that it is still uncommon for ISCTs to be part of a registered clinical trial and their application is restricted to specific diseases leaving potential benefits of ISCTs not fully exploited.

Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory ScienceVol. 60(2)
Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Uppsala University (SE), Novartis (Switzerland) (CH), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), University of Warwick (GB), Sorbonne Université (FR), German Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology (DE), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (FR), Génomique Bioinformatique et Applications (FR), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), Bayer (Switzerland) (CH), Institut thématique Génétique, génomique et bioinformatique (FR), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), Université de Rennes (FR), University of Göttingen (DE), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
5.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.