State Relations with Religion: Common Law or Special Law?

Currently, the debate over whether the State’s relationship with religion should be regulated by common law or special law is being reconsidered in somewhat different terms. On the one hand, regardless of the State–religion relationship models divided into virtually watertight categories. On the other hand, this shift is driven by two key elements that blur the boundaries of the debate. Firstly, by the recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which gives greater relevance to the principle of cooperation. This cooperation must be understood in light of the State’s duty of neutrality and the effective application of the principle of equality and non-discrimination of religious groups. Secondly, by the importance the European Union attaches to establishing an open, transparent, and regular dialogue with religious and philosophical organizations. In any case, the fact that cooperation is gaining relevance as a principle that must guide the actions of public authorities at the national level necessitates an analysis of the most adequate strategies to understand how these relations are implemented and evaluate the concrete consequences on the guarantee and effective exercise of religious and ideological freedom.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16121487
Primary Topic
Religious Freedom and Discrimination
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State Relations with Religion: Common Law or Special Law?

Silvia Meseguer-Velasco
Religions
Religious Freedom and Discrimination
article

State Relations with Religion: Common Law or Special Law?

Silvia Meseguer-Velasco
article en

Abstract

Currently, the debate over whether the State’s relationship with religion should be regulated by common law or special law is being reconsidered in somewhat different terms. On the one hand, regardless of the State–religion relationship models divided into virtually watertight categories. On the other hand, this shift is driven by two key elements that blur the boundaries of the debate. Firstly, by the recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which gives greater relevance to the principle of cooperation. This cooperation must be understood in light of the State’s duty of neutrality and the effective application of the principle of equality and non-discrimination of religious groups. Secondly, by the importance the European Union attaches to establishing an open, transparent, and regular dialogue with religious and philosophical organizations. In any case, the fact that cooperation is gaining relevance as a principle that must guide the actions of public authorities at the national level necessitates an analysis of the most adequate strategies to understand how these relations are implemented and evaluate the concrete consequences on the guarantee and effective exercise of religious and ideological freedom.

ReligionsVol. 16(12)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Religious Freedom and Discrimination
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

State Relations with Religion: Common Law or Special Law? — Silvia Meseguer-Velasco · Religions (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS