European LeukemiaNet criteria for safety and efficacy evaluation of new drugs for myelofibrosis

Most myelofibrosis (MF) drug approvals by Health Authorities are based on 1 or 2 outcome measures such as spleen volume reduction and/or improved quality of life. This 1-2 dimensional approach fails to capture the clinical complexity of MF. A European LeukemiaNet (ELN) task force developed a composite endpoint that allows multiple outcomes to be simultaneously measured. The panel used the Desirability Of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) method to assign 25 outcomes into 4 quartiles based on a multi-dimensional desirability score and build a 5-layer composite outcome named Desirability of Myelofibrosis Outcomes (DEMYO). Outcome operational definitions were tested by Delphi consensus, and correlations with survival were validated by a literature review. The outcomes assigned to the first two quartiles were negatively correlated with leukemia-free survival and survival. DEMYO comprehensively captures relevant MF clinical features and meaningful endpoints. Despite DEMYO requiring validation based on available trial data, it is expected to improve the quality of Health Authority approvals for new drugs for MF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Cancer Journal
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01381-y
Primary Topic
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

European LeukemiaNet criteria for safety and efficacy evaluation of new drugs for myelofibrosis

Alberto Álvarez‐Larrán, Steffen Koschmieder, Jean‐Jacques Kiladjian, Francesco Passamonti et al.
Blood Cancer Journal
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
article

European LeukemiaNet criteria for safety and efficacy evaluation of new drugs for myelofibrosis

Alberto Álvarez‐Larrán, Steffen Koschmieder, Jean‐Jacques Kiladjian, Francesco Passamonti, Prithviraj Bose, Ayalew Tefferi, Ruben A. Mesa, Alessandro Maria Vannucchi, Claire N. Harrison, Alessandro Rambaldi, Tiziano Barbui, John O Mascarenhas, Monia Marchetti, Robert Peter Gale, R. Hehlmann
article en

Abstract

Most myelofibrosis (MF) drug approvals by Health Authorities are based on 1 or 2 outcome measures such as spleen volume reduction and/or improved quality of life. This 1-2 dimensional approach fails to capture the clinical complexity of MF. A European LeukemiaNet (ELN) task force developed a composite endpoint that allows multiple outcomes to be simultaneously measured. The panel used the Desirability Of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) method to assign 25 outcomes into 4 quartiles based on a multi-dimensional desirability score and build a 5-layer composite outcome named Desirability of Myelofibrosis Outcomes (DEMYO). Outcome operational definitions were tested by Delphi consensus, and correlations with survival were validated by a literature review. The outcomes assigned to the first two quartiles were negatively correlated with leukemia-free survival and survival. DEMYO comprehensively captures relevant MF clinical features and meaningful endpoints. Despite DEMYO requiring validation based on available trial data, it is expected to improve the quality of Health Authority approvals for new drugs for MF.

Blood Cancer JournalVol. 15(1)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Université Paris Cité (FR), Saint Louis University Hospital (US), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo (IT), Wake Forest University (US), Imperial College London (GB), RWTH Aachen University (DE), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Harvard University, National Institute for Health and Care Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.