Examining the Interplay of Pedestrian and Right-Turning Driver Behaviors in Traffic Conflict Severity

The high number of pedestrian crashes and fatalities in the United States warrants increased attention, including at intersections where road users cross paths and interact. The primary objective of this study is to explore driver and pedestrian behaviors and their interactions during right-turn conflicts at signalized intersections, under both pedestrian post-encroachment (vehicle passes before pedestrian) and vehicle post-encroachment (vehicle passes after pedestrian) scenarios. Using data from 846 pedestrian–right-turning-vehicle conflicts observed over 1,000 h of video collected from 34 intersections in Utah, we analyzed how these behaviors influence conflict severity, measured using a time-based surrogate safety metric. Based on path analysis, the influence of drivers’ reactions on the severity of pedestrian post-encroachment conflicts and pedestrians’ reactions on the severity of post-encroachment conflicts are mediated by the reactions of the other road users (pedestrians and drivers, respectively). Specifically, the reactions of pedestrians have a more significant impact on the severity of the conflict than the reactions of drivers. Based on mediation analysis, larger total effect sizes revealed that pedestrians’ reactions—stopping and slowing down (0.506) or taking evasive actions (1.121)—during pedestrian post-encroachment conflicts do more to affect collision severity than driver’s reactions. Similarly, the effect of pedestrians taking evasive actions to avoid collisions (0.303) was slightly higher than right-turning drivers’ actions of stopping or slowing (0.200) during vehicle post-encroachment conflicts. However, because of the higher severity of post-encroachment conflicts, drivers have a greater responsibility to prevent collisions in these situations. Policy measures should consider design and operational strategies—including signs, pavement markings, and signal timing—to improve driver yielding and pedestrian protection. Focusing on the interactions between drivers and pedestrians in right-turn conflict scenarios could significantly enhance road safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981251382900
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Interplay of Pedestrian and Right-Turning Driver Behaviors in Traffic Conflict Severity

Michelle Mekker, Atul Subedi, Patrick A. Singleton, Mahyar Vahedi Saheli et al.
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Examining the Interplay of Pedestrian and Right-Turning Driver Behaviors in Traffic Conflict Severity

Michelle Mekker, Atul Subedi, Patrick A. Singleton, Mahyar Vahedi Saheli, Alyssa Gaither
article en

Abstract

The high number of pedestrian crashes and fatalities in the United States warrants increased attention, including at intersections where road users cross paths and interact. The primary objective of this study is to explore driver and pedestrian behaviors and their interactions during right-turn conflicts at signalized intersections, under both pedestrian post-encroachment (vehicle passes before pedestrian) and vehicle post-encroachment (vehicle passes after pedestrian) scenarios. Using data from 846 pedestrian–right-turning-vehicle conflicts observed over 1,000 h of video collected from 34 intersections in Utah, we analyzed how these behaviors influence conflict severity, measured using a time-based surrogate safety metric. Based on path analysis, the influence of drivers’ reactions on the severity of pedestrian post-encroachment conflicts and pedestrians’ reactions on the severity of post-encroachment conflicts are mediated by the reactions of the other road users (pedestrians and drivers, respectively). Specifically, the reactions of pedestrians have a more significant impact on the severity of the conflict than the reactions of drivers. Based on mediation analysis, larger total effect sizes revealed that pedestrians’ reactions—stopping and slowing down (0.506) or taking evasive actions (1.121)—during pedestrian post-encroachment conflicts do more to affect collision severity than driver’s reactions. Similarly, the effect of pedestrians taking evasive actions to avoid collisions (0.303) was slightly higher than right-turning drivers’ actions of stopping or slowing (0.200) during vehicle post-encroachment conflicts. However, because of the higher severity of post-encroachment conflicts, drivers have a greater responsibility to prevent collisions in these situations. Policy measures should consider design and operational strategies—including signs, pavement markings, and signal timing—to improve driver yielding and pedestrian protection. Focusing on the interactions between drivers and pedestrians in right-turn conflict scenarios could significantly enhance road safety.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Utah State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.