“It Depends on the Choices that Are Made Now.” Parental Perspectives on the Use of Automated Methods in Early Childhood Developmental Checks

Abstract Automated methodologies and artificial intelligence (AI) raise new opportunities to support assessment of young children’s development. Little is known about parents’ views on such technologies, which could have implications for development and adoption of innovations in this area. In this study, we use an acceptability framework to explore in what contexts and under what conditions, automated, AI-based assessment of early child development might be accepted by parents. Seventy-three complete online survey responses were gathered from parents of children under 5 years of age, living in England. Analysis was conducted via a combination of descriptive and thematic analyses. We found that parents showed a mixture of worry and optimism about AI-based assessment, as well as a substantial number who were ambivalent or uncertain of their views. We discuss findings in relation to acceptability considerations for wide-spread innovation and implementation of automated analyses in early childhood services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Early Childhood Education Journal
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-02046-y
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It Depends on the Choices that Are Made Now.” Parental Perspectives on the Use of Automated Methods in Early Childhood Developmental Checks

Jenny L. Gibson, Soizic Le Courtois, Matthew Barnes
Early Childhood Education Journal
Child Development and Digital Technology
article

“It Depends on the Choices that Are Made Now.” Parental Perspectives on the Use of Automated Methods in Early Childhood Developmental Checks

Jenny L. Gibson, Soizic Le Courtois, Matthew Barnes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Automated methodologies and artificial intelligence (AI) raise new opportunities to support assessment of young children’s development. Little is known about parents’ views on such technologies, which could have implications for development and adoption of innovations in this area. In this study, we use an acceptability framework to explore in what contexts and under what conditions, automated, AI-based assessment of early child development might be accepted by parents. Seventy-three complete online survey responses were gathered from parents of children under 5 years of age, living in England. Analysis was conducted via a combination of descriptive and thematic analyses. We found that parents showed a mixture of worry and optimism about AI-based assessment, as well as a substantial number who were ambivalent or uncertain of their views. We discuss findings in relation to acceptability considerations for wide-spread innovation and implementation of automated analyses in early childhood services.

Early Childhood Education Journal
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Child Development and Digital Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.