China’s Agricultural Productivity: Foreign and Indigenous Innovation Compared

This study investigates the dynamic interplay between agricultural productivity and technological progress in China, explicitly distinguishing between indigenous innovation and foreign technology transfer — a gap largely unaddressed in prior research. Employing a Structural Vector Autoregressive (SVAR) model, the analysis integrates time-series data beginning in the year 1995, when patent registration by Chinese residents began. It focuses on the three core variables of agricultural productivity, domestic technological innovation, and foreign technology inflows. The findings reveal a causal and statistically significant link between agricultural productivity and indigenous technological progress. While foreign technology contributes to the innovation process, its impact appears to be comparatively limited and often mediated through compulsory transfer mechanisms rather than voluntary diffusion. The evidence suggests that China’s initial productivity gains were largely fueled by economic liberalization, which subsequently laid the foundation for local sustained innovation. These results have notable policy implications for emerging economies and underscore the importance of first investing in economic reforms to foster an agricultural transformation that is both enduring and information-driven.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Issues & Studies
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s1013251125500158
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Productivity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China’s Agricultural Productivity: Foreign and Indigenous Innovation Compared

Jhon Valdiglesias Oviedo
Issues & Studies
Economic Growth and Productivity
article

China’s Agricultural Productivity: Foreign and Indigenous Innovation Compared

Jhon Valdiglesias Oviedo
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamic interplay between agricultural productivity and technological progress in China, explicitly distinguishing between indigenous innovation and foreign technology transfer — a gap largely unaddressed in prior research. Employing a Structural Vector Autoregressive (SVAR) model, the analysis integrates time-series data beginning in the year 1995, when patent registration by Chinese residents began. It focuses on the three core variables of agricultural productivity, domestic technological innovation, and foreign technology inflows. The findings reveal a causal and statistically significant link between agricultural productivity and indigenous technological progress. While foreign technology contributes to the innovation process, its impact appears to be comparatively limited and often mediated through compulsory transfer mechanisms rather than voluntary diffusion. The evidence suggests that China’s initial productivity gains were largely fueled by economic liberalization, which subsequently laid the foundation for local sustained innovation. These results have notable policy implications for emerging economies and underscore the importance of first investing in economic reforms to foster an agricultural transformation that is both enduring and information-driven.

Issues & StudiesVol. 61(04)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Economic Growth and Productivity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

China’s Agricultural Productivity: Foreign and Indigenous Innovation Compared — Jhon Valdiglesias Oviedo · Issues & Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS