Multimodal analysis of whole slide images in colorectal cancer

Multimodal models have enabled the integration of digital pathology, radiology, clinical information, and omics data to enhance Colorectal cancer (CRC) care. This systematic review critically appraises Multimodal digital pathology techniques applied in CRC, their performance, and contrasts them with foundation models. We identified and screened 1601 studies published between January 2014 and August 2024 using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore (PROSPERO protocol: 635831). The quality and bias of the 22 eligible studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Our findings suggest that majority of the studies integrated different modalities to enhance diagnostic accuracy and survival prediction. Various fusion techniques have been used to extract novel features. Most studies did not undertake external validation. Compared to unimodal models, multimodal approaches demonstrate superior performance but challenges remain, including constructing multimodal datasets, managing data heterogeneity, ensuring temporal alignment, determining modality weighting, and improving interpretability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02095-y
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal analysis of whole slide images in colorectal cancer

Ruijiang Li, Yuzhi Guo, Jana Lipková, Jitendra Jonnagaddala et al.
npj Digital Medicine
AI in cancer detection
article

Multimodal analysis of whole slide images in colorectal cancer

Ruijiang Li, Yuzhi Guo, Jana Lipková, Jitendra Jonnagaddala, Toni Rose Jue, Junzhou Huang, Anton Gradišek, Miljana Shulajkovska, Jamil Mahmoud El Chayeb, Qifeng Zhou, Jakob Nikolas Kather
article en

Abstract

Multimodal models have enabled the integration of digital pathology, radiology, clinical information, and omics data to enhance Colorectal cancer (CRC) care. This systematic review critically appraises Multimodal digital pathology techniques applied in CRC, their performance, and contrasts them with foundation models. We identified and screened 1601 studies published between January 2014 and August 2024 using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore (PROSPERO protocol: 635831). The quality and bias of the 22 eligible studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Our findings suggest that majority of the studies integrated different modalities to enhance diagnostic accuracy and survival prediction. Various fusion techniques have been used to extract novel features. Most studies did not undertake external validation. Compared to unimodal models, multimodal approaches demonstrate superior performance but challenges remain, including constructing multimodal datasets, managing data heterogeneity, ensuring temporal alignment, determining modality weighting, and improving interpretability.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
University of Leeds (GB), The University of Texas at Arlington (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Heidelberg University (DE), Shaikh Khalifa Medical City (AE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Jožef Stefan Institute (SI), UNSW Sydney (AU), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School (SI), Irvine University (US), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Data61 (AU), Stanford University (US)
Nvidia, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, European Commission, Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, University of New South Wales, Deutsche Krebshilfe, Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss, National Institutes of Health, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council, Leeds Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.