Regulating Emotion, Regulating Selves: A Critique of the Emotion Regulation Discourse in Psychotherapy

The discourse of emotional regulation is a dominant narrative in contemporary psychotherapy and clinical social work practice, framed as essential to psychological well-being and adaptive functioning. However, through a critical theory and narrative therapy lens, emotional regulation reveals itself as a technology of neoliberal governance that individualizes distress and obscures sociopolitical contexts. Drawing from Foucauldian ideas, feminist theory, critical social work, and narrative therapy practices, this article critiques emotional regulation as a disciplinary discourse that upholds normative ideals of an emotionally self-governing subject. It highlights how such discourse disproportionately burdens marginalized communities and pathologizes resistance, dissent, or grief. Narrative therapy offers a politicized and relational alternative that centers meaning-making, deconstructs emotional norms, and foregrounds social justice. Implications for anti-oppressive therapeutic practice are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Affilia
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099251398837
Primary Topic
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulating Emotion, Regulating Selves: A Critique of the Emotion Regulation Discourse in Psychotherapy

David Nylund
Affilia
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
article

Regulating Emotion, Regulating Selves: A Critique of the Emotion Regulation Discourse in Psychotherapy

David Nylund
article en

Abstract

The discourse of emotional regulation is a dominant narrative in contemporary psychotherapy and clinical social work practice, framed as essential to psychological well-being and adaptive functioning. However, through a critical theory and narrative therapy lens, emotional regulation reveals itself as a technology of neoliberal governance that individualizes distress and obscures sociopolitical contexts. Drawing from Foucauldian ideas, feminist theory, critical social work, and narrative therapy practices, this article critiques emotional regulation as a disciplinary discourse that upholds normative ideals of an emotionally self-governing subject. It highlights how such discourse disproportionately burdens marginalized communities and pathologizes resistance, dissent, or grief. Narrative therapy offers a politicized and relational alternative that centers meaning-making, deconstructs emotional norms, and foregrounds social justice. Implications for anti-oppressive therapeutic practice are discussed.

Affilia
California State University, Sacramento (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.