Association: one term, five concepts

‘Association’ is certainly one of the most prevalent terms in the study of mind, brain and behavior. It applies to actions, stimuli, neurons, brain areas, ideas, words, etc. However, we argue that this term carries qualitatively different meanings, a largely underappreciated fact. Based on a review traversing neuroscience, psychology, computer science and linguistics, we delineate and characterize five categories of usage, expressing five distinct notions of associative link which ought to be distinguished. We show how these concepts improve polysemy and synonymy issues, and together constitute a useful set of descriptive tools for the associationist framework. As they allow more transparent articulation of results and theories concerned with associations in both biological and artificial systems, they facilitate comparison of findings from different fields. The proposed terminology aims at promoting dialogue and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/57zj4_v4
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association: one term, five concepts

Thomas F. Chartier, Joël Fagot, Arnaud Rey
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

Association: one term, five concepts

Thomas F. Chartier, Joël Fagot, Arnaud Rey
article en

Abstract

‘Association’ is certainly one of the most prevalent terms in the study of mind, brain and behavior. It applies to actions, stimuli, neurons, brain areas, ideas, words, etc. However, we argue that this term carries qualitatively different meanings, a largely underappreciated fact. Based on a review traversing neuroscience, psychology, computer science and linguistics, we delineate and characterize five categories of usage, expressing five distinct notions of associative link which ought to be distinguished. We show how these concepts improve polysemy and synonymy issues, and together constitute a useful set of descriptive tools for the associationist framework. As they allow more transparent articulation of results and theories concerned with associations in both biological and artificial systems, they facilitate comparison of findings from different fields. The proposed terminology aims at promoting dialogue and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.