Artificial Intelligence in Bone Fracture Detection: A Review of Evidence, Limitations, and Clinical Integration

Medical imaging is rapidly being improved by artificial intelligence (AI), with deep-learning systems performing well in radiography, CT, and MRI for fracture detection, classification, and localization. This narrative review examined recent evidence spanning different types of bone fractures, alongside soft-tissue injuries relevant to orthopedic decision-making. Across multiple meta-analyses and external validations, reported sensitivities and specificities commonly range from 0.85 to 0.95, while AI also supports workflow triage and reader confidence. Persistent gaps include limited generalizability, inconsistent reference standards, spectrum bias, regulatory and ethical challenges, and implementation costs. We outline pragmatic quality considerations and emphasize prospective, multi-center trials and transparent reporting for safe clinical integration. AI should augment clinicians, improving speed, accuracy, and overall patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.97674
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Bone Fracture Detection: A Review of Evidence, Limitations, and Clinical Integration

Ashis Kumar Paul, Rajvi Shah, Ahmed Swealem, Anmeng Sha et al.
Cureus
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Artificial Intelligence in Bone Fracture Detection: A Review of Evidence, Limitations, and Clinical Integration

Ashis Kumar Paul, Rajvi Shah, Ahmed Swealem, Anmeng Sha, Ali Soffar, Ahmed Elkohail, Haritha Haridas Mandoth Veetil, Mohammed S Millat, Mohamed Wasim Shaffe Ahamed, Larisa Radu
article en

Abstract

Medical imaging is rapidly being improved by artificial intelligence (AI), with deep-learning systems performing well in radiography, CT, and MRI for fracture detection, classification, and localization. This narrative review examined recent evidence spanning different types of bone fractures, alongside soft-tissue injuries relevant to orthopedic decision-making. Across multiple meta-analyses and external validations, reported sensitivities and specificities commonly range from 0.85 to 0.95, while AI also supports workflow triage and reader confidence. Persistent gaps include limited generalizability, inconsistent reference standards, spectrum bias, regulatory and ethical challenges, and implementation costs. We outline pragmatic quality considerations and emphasize prospective, multi-center trials and transparent reporting for safe clinical integration. AI should augment clinicians, improving speed, accuracy, and overall patient outcomes.

CureusVol. 17(11)
North Bristol NHS Trust (GB), Princess Royal University Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.