“It's Not Just an Assignment”: A Duoethnography on the (Op)positionality of Evaluator Identity

This piece is grounded in the critical feminisms within standpoint epistemology and decolonial theories. We present our histories and experiences as methodologists and evaluators using a collaborative and dialogical method, duoethnography. After reviewing one another's written memos, we engaged in conversation through voice memos and face-to-face interactions. Together, we analyzed and compared these incidents and experiences to locate how our identities of power, privilege, and oppression motivate the theories and practices we use as evaluators. We then distilled these memos and conversations to narratively present personal insights and vignettes that explore our (op)positionality as evaluators. Continually questioning one's past and present role as an evaluator, and as one's full self, requires comfort with uncertainty. This uncertainty can aid evaluators in efforts to deconstruct deeply held and often oppressive ways of being and knowing as they move toward more liberatory forms of evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Evaluation
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140251396830
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It's Not Just an Assignment”: A Duoethnography on the (Op)positionality of Evaluator Identity

Giovanni P. Dazzo, Ashley Williams
1 citations
American Journal of Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
2.11
article

“It's Not Just an Assignment”: A Duoethnography on the (Op)positionality of Evaluator Identity

Giovanni P. Dazzo, Ashley Williams
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This piece is grounded in the critical feminisms within standpoint epistemology and decolonial theories. We present our histories and experiences as methodologists and evaluators using a collaborative and dialogical method, duoethnography. After reviewing one another's written memos, we engaged in conversation through voice memos and face-to-face interactions. Together, we analyzed and compared these incidents and experiences to locate how our identities of power, privilege, and oppression motivate the theories and practices we use as evaluators. We then distilled these memos and conversations to narratively present personal insights and vignettes that explore our (op)positionality as evaluators. Continually questioning one's past and present role as an evaluator, and as one's full self, requires comfort with uncertainty. This uncertainty can aid evaluators in efforts to deconstruct deeply held and often oppressive ways of being and knowing as they move toward more liberatory forms of evaluation.

American Journal of EvaluationVol. 47(1)
University of Georgia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.