Between Customisation and Simplicity: A Student‐Led Comparative Study of <scp>MoodleCloud</scp> and Google Classroom in Higher Education

ABSTRACT This study explores the pedagogical implications of student‐led course design using two widely adopted freemium learning management systems ( LMSs ): MoodleCloud and Google Classroom . In a university‐level ICT module at Complutense University of Madrid, students were tasked with designing parallel virtual classrooms using both platforms. Through thematic analysis of structured group reflections, the study identifies key areas of contrast in terms of usability, customisation, collaborative tools, and instructional design flexibility. The findings reveal a pattern: while Google Classroom is perceived as intuitive and efficient, MoodleCloud is favoured for its pedagogical depth and modular customisation, despite a steeper learning curve. By positioning students as novice instructional designers, the study uncovers how LMS affordances shape digital pedagogy, learner agency, and course planning in higher education. The study contributes to research on comparative LMS evaluation by introducing a student‐as‐designer perspective, offering implications for educators, institutions, and technologists seeking to optimise platform selection and instructional design in hybrid or low‐resource settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70320
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Customisation and Simplicity: A Student‐Led Comparative Study of MoodleCloud and Google Classroom in Higher Education

Pablo Agustín Artero Abellán
European Journal of Education
Online and Blended Learning
article

Between Customisation and Simplicity: A Student‐Led Comparative Study of MoodleCloud and Google Classroom in Higher Education

Pablo Agustín Artero Abellán
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explores the pedagogical implications of student‐led course design using two widely adopted freemium learning management systems ( LMSs ): MoodleCloud and Google Classroom . In a university‐level ICT module at Complutense University of Madrid, students were tasked with designing parallel virtual classrooms using both platforms. Through thematic analysis of structured group reflections, the study identifies key areas of contrast in terms of usability, customisation, collaborative tools, and instructional design flexibility. The findings reveal a pattern: while Google Classroom is perceived as intuitive and efficient, MoodleCloud is favoured for its pedagogical depth and modular customisation, despite a steeper learning curve. By positioning students as novice instructional designers, the study uncovers how LMS affordances shape digital pedagogy, learner agency, and course planning in higher education. The study contributes to research on comparative LMS evaluation by introducing a student‐as‐designer perspective, offering implications for educators, institutions, and technologists seeking to optimise platform selection and instructional design in hybrid or low‐resource settings.

European Journal of EducationVol. 60(4)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between Customisation and Simplicity: A Student‐Led Comparative Study of <scp>MoodleCloud</scp> and Google Classroom in Higher Education — Pablo Agustín Artero Abellán · European Journal of Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS