Migration and the persistence of violence

Using data on millions of internal US migrants, we document that historical homicide rates follow migrants around the United States. Individuals born in historically safe states remain safer wherever they go, while individuals born in historically dangerous states face a greater risk, including from police violence. This pattern holds across demographic characteristics such as age, gender, and marital status, across migrant groups with different average levels of education, income, and even when comparing migrants from different states who reside in the same county. To help understand why, we conducted a large national survey that oversampled internal White US migrants. The results suggest this persistence may reflect a sociocultural adaptation to dangerous settings. Residents and migrants from historically unsafe states-mainly former frontier states and the deep South-see the world as more dangerous, react more forcefully in aggressive scenarios, value toughness, distrust law enforcement, and say they rely on self and family in violent situations. These adaptations may have kept them safe in historically dangerous states, but may increase their vulnerability to harm in safer states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2500535122
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Migration and the persistence of violence

Martin Vinæs Larsen, Anna Mikkelborg, Gabriel Lenz
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

Migration and the persistence of violence

Martin Vinæs Larsen, Anna Mikkelborg, Gabriel Lenz
article en

Abstract

Using data on millions of internal US migrants, we document that historical homicide rates follow migrants around the United States. Individuals born in historically safe states remain safer wherever they go, while individuals born in historically dangerous states face a greater risk, including from police violence. This pattern holds across demographic characteristics such as age, gender, and marital status, across migrant groups with different average levels of education, income, and even when comparing migrants from different states who reside in the same county. To help understand why, we conducted a large national survey that oversampled internal White US migrants. The results suggest this persistence may reflect a sociocultural adaptation to dangerous settings. Residents and migrants from historically unsafe states-mainly former frontier states and the deep South-see the world as more dangerous, react more forcefully in aggressive scenarios, value toughness, distrust law enforcement, and say they rely on self and family in violent situations. These adaptations may have kept them safe in historically dangerous states, but may increase their vulnerability to harm in safer states.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(48)
Aarhus University (DK), Colorado State University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Migration and the persistence of violence — Martin Vinæs Larsen, Anna Mikkelborg, et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS