A 120-y time series of genomes reveals the consequences of closed breeding in German Shepherd Dogs
Many contemporary breed dogs display reduced genomic health compared to mixed-breed dogs, including reduced heterozygosity and increased genetic load, likely due to strong directed breeding. Lack of historical genomes, however, has made it difficult to disentangle the timing and drivers of these declines given complex and breed-specific demographic histories, artificial selection, and crossbreeding. Here, we sequenced genomes of nine 20th-century museum specimens (1906-1993) of pedigree German Shepherd Dogs (GSDs) to directly assess the consequences of contemporary breeding practices on genomic diversity and health over time. The GSD breed offers an excellent case study, given the breed's fluctuations in global popularity, differing selective regimes, and the GSD's use in the establishment of other breeds, including wolfdogs. Genome-wide heterozygosity showed significant reductions after the Second World War (WWII), coincident with an increase in both the frequency of runs of homozygosity and load. We also detected repeated population bottlenecks linked to the use of popular sires throughout the 20th century. Finally, although hybridization with wolves has led to genome-wide increases in heterozygosity in wolfdog breeds derived from the GSD, nonadmixed ancestry blocks (dog or wolf) were severely depleted in diversity due to the limited number of founders involved in their establishment. Combined, our results indicate that declines in the genomic health of GSDs and related breeds occurred not at the onset of breed formation but throughout the last century, as a result of population bottlenecks associated with WWII and the repeated use of popular sires.
Authors
- Tatiana R. Feuerborn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-3402)
- Reuben M. Buckley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6334-3906)
- Kristina Tabbada (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8728-8291)
- Greger Larson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-0392)
- Lachie Scarsbrook (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2558-4455)
- Tosso Leeb (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0553-4880)
- Laurent Frantz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8030-3885)
- Gabriella J. Spatola (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7889-3425)
- Alex C. Harris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6868-5363)
- Olaf Thalmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1700-0130)
- Elaine A. Ostrander (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-9738)
- Dayna L. Dreger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3218-6431)
- Timothy Alexander Mousseau (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2235-4868)
- Anne‐Claire Fabre (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7310-1775)
- Stefan Hertwig (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1617-8180)
- Alberto Carmagnini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5215-4269)
Institutions
- University of Bern (CH)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Natural History Museum (GB)
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Natural History Museum of Bern (CH)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (US)
- Oxford Archaeology (GB)
- Cancer Genetics (United States) (US)
- Research Network (United States) (US)
- Deutsche Meeresmuseum (DE)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2025-11-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2421755122
- Primary Topic
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- National Institutes of Health
- Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
- Leibniz-Rechenzentrum
- National Human Genome Research Institute