Beyond Green Signaling: Are Institutional Investors Decarbonizing Their Portfolios?

This study examines whether institutional investors decarbonize their U.S. equity portfolios after signing the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI). Through portfolio-level difference-in-differences and firm-level ownership regressions, this analysis uses quarterly 13F filings from 2006–2022 to explore how PRI signatories differ from non-signatories in reallocation decisions and ownership influence on firm-level emissions. The portfolio-level findings show that while PRI signatories maintain lower portfolio carbon footprints in US holdings overall, the act of signing PRI does not lead to significant reductions in their carbon footprint over time. European investors’ portfolios even show potential increases in carbon footprint after signing. The firm-level analysis shows a more nuanced dynamic, with the impact varying based on institutions’ investment approaches. PRI signatories classified as quasi-indexers demonstrate superior effectiveness in reducing firm-level emissions through their ownership positions. These results suggest the need for practical frameworks to better align voluntary commitments with measurable outcomes, contributing to ongoing debates on the efficacy of market-based versus regulatory approaches to responsible investing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Economics & Finance
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104767
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Green Signaling: Are Institutional Investors Decarbonizing Their Portfolios?

Mohammad R. Allahdadi
International Review of Economics & Finance
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
article

Beyond Green Signaling: Are Institutional Investors Decarbonizing Their Portfolios?

Mohammad R. Allahdadi
article en

Abstract

This study examines whether institutional investors decarbonize their U.S. equity portfolios after signing the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI). Through portfolio-level difference-in-differences and firm-level ownership regressions, this analysis uses quarterly 13F filings from 2006–2022 to explore how PRI signatories differ from non-signatories in reallocation decisions and ownership influence on firm-level emissions. The portfolio-level findings show that while PRI signatories maintain lower portfolio carbon footprints in US holdings overall, the act of signing PRI does not lead to significant reductions in their carbon footprint over time. European investors’ portfolios even show potential increases in carbon footprint after signing. The firm-level analysis shows a more nuanced dynamic, with the impact varying based on institutions’ investment approaches. PRI signatories classified as quasi-indexers demonstrate superior effectiveness in reducing firm-level emissions through their ownership positions. These results suggest the need for practical frameworks to better align voluntary commitments with measurable outcomes, contributing to ongoing debates on the efficacy of market-based versus regulatory approaches to responsible investing.

International Review of Economics & FinanceVol. 104
Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond Green Signaling: Are Institutional Investors Decarbonizing Their Portfolios? — Mohammad R. Allahdadi · International Review of Economics & Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS