LLM-guided chemical process optimization with a multi-agent approach

Abstract Chemical process optimization is crucial to maximize production efficiency and economic performance. Optimization algorithms, including gradient-based solvers, numerical methods, and parameter grid searches, become impractical when operating constraints are ill-defined or unavailable, requiring engineers to rely on subjective heuristics to estimate feasible parameter ranges. To address this constraint definition bottleneck, we present a multi-agent framework of large language model (LLM) agents that autonomously infer operating constraints from minimal process descriptions, then collaboratively guide optimization using the inferred constraints. Our AutoGen-based agentic framework employs OpenAI’s o3 model, with specialized agents for constraint generation, parameter validation, simulation execution, and optimization guidance. Through two phases: (i) autonomous constraint generation using embedded domain knowledge, and (ii) iterative multi-agent optimization, the framework eliminates the need for predefined operational bounds. Validated on the hydrodealkylation process across cost, yield, and yield-to-cost ratio metrics, the framework demonstrated competitive performance with conventional optimization methods while achieving a 31-fold reduction in wall-time relative to grid search, converging in under 20 min and requiring far fewer iterations to converge. Beyond computational efficiency, the framework’s reasoning-guided search demonstrates sophisticated process understanding, correctly identifying utility trade-offs, and applying domain-informed heuristics. Unlike conventional optimization methods like Bayesian optimization that require predefined constraints, our approach uniquely combines autonomous constraint generation with interpretable, reasoning-guided parameter exploration. Reproducibility analysis across five independent trials demonstrates consistent convergence behavior, while model comparison reveals that reasoning-capable LLM architectures (o3, o1) are essential for successful optimization, with standard models failing to converge effectively. This approach shows significant potential for optimization scenarios where operational constraints are poorly characterized or unavailable, particularly for emerging processes and retrofit applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ae2382
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Process Optimization and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LLM-guided chemical process optimization with a multi-agent approach

Janghoon Ock, Amir Barati Farimani, Tianqin Zeng, Srivathsan Badrinarayanan et al.
5 citations
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Process Optimization and Integration
6.07
article

LLM-guided chemical process optimization with a multi-agent approach

Janghoon Ock, Amir Barati Farimani, Tianqin Zeng, Srivathsan Badrinarayanan, Cheng-Kai Lai
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Chemical process optimization is crucial to maximize production efficiency and economic performance. Optimization algorithms, including gradient-based solvers, numerical methods, and parameter grid searches, become impractical when operating constraints are ill-defined or unavailable, requiring engineers to rely on subjective heuristics to estimate feasible parameter ranges. To address this constraint definition bottleneck, we present a multi-agent framework of large language model (LLM) agents that autonomously infer operating constraints from minimal process descriptions, then collaboratively guide optimization using the inferred constraints. Our AutoGen-based agentic framework employs OpenAI’s o3 model, with specialized agents for constraint generation, parameter validation, simulation execution, and optimization guidance. Through two phases: (i) autonomous constraint generation using embedded domain knowledge, and (ii) iterative multi-agent optimization, the framework eliminates the need for predefined operational bounds. Validated on the hydrodealkylation process across cost, yield, and yield-to-cost ratio metrics, the framework demonstrated competitive performance with conventional optimization methods while achieving a 31-fold reduction in wall-time relative to grid search, converging in under 20 min and requiring far fewer iterations to converge. Beyond computational efficiency, the framework’s reasoning-guided search demonstrates sophisticated process understanding, correctly identifying utility trade-offs, and applying domain-informed heuristics. Unlike conventional optimization methods like Bayesian optimization that require predefined constraints, our approach uniquely combines autonomous constraint generation with interpretable, reasoning-guided parameter exploration. Reproducibility analysis across five independent trials demonstrates consistent convergence behavior, while model comparison reveals that reasoning-capable LLM architectures (o3, o1) are essential for successful optimization, with standard models failing to converge effectively. This approach shows significant potential for optimization scenarios where operational constraints are poorly characterized or unavailable, particularly for emerging processes and retrofit applications.

Machine Learning Science and TechnologyVol. 6(4)
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Process Optimization and Integration
6.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.