Exploring faculty perceptions of barriers to metaverse integration in higher education: development and validation of a new scale

This study aimed to develop and conduct an exploratory validation of the Barriers to Integrating the Metaverse into Higher Education Scale (BIMHES) to assess faculty members’ perceptions of challenges in adopting the metaverse in educational settings. 512 Saudi Arabian faculty members participated in the current study. The first phase was qualitative, involving interviews and a literature review to generate items for the scale. The second phase was quantitative, assessing the scale’s psychometric properties, including face, content, and construct validity through preliminary (exploratory) and confirmatory factor analysis. Additionally, the study evaluated the scale’s stability and internal consistency reliability. A network perspective was also applied using Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA). The final scale comprised 38 items across six primary dimensions: Digital Infrastructure, Strategic Alignment, Adaptive Learning and Content Design, Technological Perceptions, Socio-Cultural Integration, and Ethical Governance and Data Security. Model fit indices (CFI = 0.938, RMSEA = 0.063) and reliability measures (α = 0.925, Ω = 0.903) indicated strong validity and internal consistency of BIMHES. Network analysis supported the six-factor structure of the BIMHES. Totally, this instrument offers practical insights for developing the technological infrastructure and implementing suitable educational programs, ensuring that institutions are better prepared to leverage the potential of the metaverse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06250-4
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring faculty perceptions of barriers to metaverse integration in higher education: development and validation of a new scale

Ali O. Alqarni
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
article

Exploring faculty perceptions of barriers to metaverse integration in higher education: development and validation of a new scale

Ali O. Alqarni
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and conduct an exploratory validation of the Barriers to Integrating the Metaverse into Higher Education Scale (BIMHES) to assess faculty members’ perceptions of challenges in adopting the metaverse in educational settings. 512 Saudi Arabian faculty members participated in the current study. The first phase was qualitative, involving interviews and a literature review to generate items for the scale. The second phase was quantitative, assessing the scale’s psychometric properties, including face, content, and construct validity through preliminary (exploratory) and confirmatory factor analysis. Additionally, the study evaluated the scale’s stability and internal consistency reliability. A network perspective was also applied using Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA). The final scale comprised 38 items across six primary dimensions: Digital Infrastructure, Strategic Alignment, Adaptive Learning and Content Design, Technological Perceptions, Socio-Cultural Integration, and Ethical Governance and Data Security. Model fit indices (CFI = 0.938, RMSEA = 0.063) and reliability measures (α = 0.925, Ω = 0.903) indicated strong validity and internal consistency of BIMHES. Network analysis supported the six-factor structure of the BIMHES. Totally, this instrument offers practical insights for developing the technological infrastructure and implementing suitable educational programs, ensuring that institutions are better prepared to leverage the potential of the metaverse.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Umm al-Qura University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.