Sequential recovery of power system in cascading failure based on Recovery Probability Matrix

Cascading failure in power system may trigger extensive blackouts with severe societal consequences. This paper proposes a probabilistic recovery framework that centers on a Recovery Probability Matrix (RPM). The Recovery Probability Matrix (RPM) quantifies the extent to which actively restoring failed links either facilitates or inhibits the passive recovery of other links. Building on the RPM, a Joint Centrality (JC) is introduced to capture both the systemic influence and structural dependency of links. Three recovery strategies are developed based on the RPM and JC, including Static Batch Recovery, Static Incremental Recovery, and a Dynamic strategy that adaptively adjusts priorities as the network evolves. This Dynamic strategy forms an adaptive recovery chain, where each decision is guided by the current network state and influences subsequent actions. Simulations on the IEEE 39 Bus Test Case show that the Static Batch strategy achieves rapid recovery but may overuse resources, whereas the Dynamic strategy yields stable and resource-efficient performance under moderate and severe stress levels. All RPM-based strategies consistently outperform baseline methods in recovering links, load, and total system performance under both moderate and severe failure scenarios. • Recovery Probability Matrix (RPM) models link-level recovery influence. • Joint Centrality (JC) measures systemic impact and structural dependency. • Three recovery strategies: static batch, incremental, and dynamic. • Dynamic strategy adapts to topology changes and limits secondary failures. • RPM-based strategies are faster and more efficient than baselines; dynamic is best.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.111421
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sequential recovery of power system in cascading failure based on Recovery Probability Matrix

Hui Ge, Yanqing Lu, Shengquan Li, Lei Chen et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
0.73
article

Sequential recovery of power system in cascading failure based on Recovery Probability Matrix

Hui Ge, Yanqing Lu, Shengquan Li, Lei Chen, Jianbo Chen, Sijia Guo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cascading failure in power system may trigger extensive blackouts with severe societal consequences. This paper proposes a probabilistic recovery framework that centers on a Recovery Probability Matrix (RPM). The Recovery Probability Matrix (RPM) quantifies the extent to which actively restoring failed links either facilitates or inhibits the passive recovery of other links. Building on the RPM, a Joint Centrality (JC) is introduced to capture both the systemic influence and structural dependency of links. Three recovery strategies are developed based on the RPM and JC, including Static Batch Recovery, Static Incremental Recovery, and a Dynamic strategy that adaptively adjusts priorities as the network evolves. This Dynamic strategy forms an adaptive recovery chain, where each decision is guided by the current network state and influences subsequent actions. Simulations on the IEEE 39 Bus Test Case show that the Static Batch strategy achieves rapid recovery but may overuse resources, whereas the Dynamic strategy yields stable and resource-efficient performance under moderate and severe stress levels. All RPM-based strategies consistently outperform baseline methods in recovering links, load, and total system performance under both moderate and severe failure scenarios. • Recovery Probability Matrix (RPM) models link-level recovery influence. • Joint Centrality (JC) measures systemic impact and structural dependency. • Three recovery strategies: static batch, incremental, and dynamic. • Dynamic strategy adapts to topology changes and limits secondary failures. • RPM-based strategies are faster and more efficient than baselines; dynamic is best.

International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy SystemsVol. 173
Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Yangzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.