Happy me: Asymmetric bidirectional links between the self and positivity underpin biased processing

Understanding how the self relates to emotional valence is fundamental to theories of self-concept and cognitive bias. While separate literatures have documented advantages for information associated with the self and information of positive valence, the mechanisms and directionality of their interaction remain poorly understood. Across three experiments combining evaluative priming and shape-label matching tasks, the current research examined whether self-positivity and self-negativity reflect bidirectional expectations between self and emotional information. Results revealed an asymmetric bidirectional relationship: positive emotion primes enhanced self-stranger bias magnitudes by inhibiting processing of stranger-related targets rather than facilitating self-associated targets (Experiment 1a), while self-primes facilitated positivity-bias magnitudes by enhancing processing of positive emotional targets (Experiment 2). Critically, no analogous effects emerged for negative valence (Experiment 1b). These findings suggest that the dominant mechanism linking self and positivity depends on the direction in which the association is activated: emotional context shapes self-prioritization through inhibition of distal-other representations, while self-context shapes emotional processing through direct facilitation of positive information. The theoretical implications for self-concept maintenance and predictive processing accounts of social cognition are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Psychology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70100
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Happy me: Asymmetric bidirectional links between the self and positivity underpin biased processing

Douglas S. Martin, Jie Sui, Naomi Lee
British Journal of Psychology
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Happy me: Asymmetric bidirectional links between the self and positivity underpin biased processing

Douglas S. Martin, Jie Sui, Naomi Lee
article en

Abstract

Understanding how the self relates to emotional valence is fundamental to theories of self-concept and cognitive bias. While separate literatures have documented advantages for information associated with the self and information of positive valence, the mechanisms and directionality of their interaction remain poorly understood. Across three experiments combining evaluative priming and shape-label matching tasks, the current research examined whether self-positivity and self-negativity reflect bidirectional expectations between self and emotional information. Results revealed an asymmetric bidirectional relationship: positive emotion primes enhanced self-stranger bias magnitudes by inhibiting processing of stranger-related targets rather than facilitating self-associated targets (Experiment 1a), while self-primes facilitated positivity-bias magnitudes by enhancing processing of positive emotional targets (Experiment 2). Critically, no analogous effects emerged for negative valence (Experiment 1b). These findings suggest that the dominant mechanism linking self and positivity depends on the direction in which the association is activated: emotional context shapes self-prioritization through inhibition of distal-other representations, while self-context shapes emotional processing through direct facilitation of positive information. The theoretical implications for self-concept maintenance and predictive processing accounts of social cognition are discussed.

British Journal of Psychology
University of Aberdeen (GB), University of Worcester (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.