Investigating the Effects of Augmented Reality on Message Credibility When Visualizing Environmental Impacts

Augmented reality (AR) has increasingly been used to communicate environmental impacts, offering greater engagement than conventional displays. However, its effect on message credibility-how much people believe in the content of the communication-remains unclear. In a preregistered study, we compared the perceived credibility of environmental information presented via visualizations on an AR headset or a desktop display. We created display-specific visual encodings (3D concrete for AR, 2D bar charts for desktop) and added two control conditions to cross display and encoding. We found no difference in message credibility between AR and desktop, though concrete AR was rated most engaging. Supplementary material is available at https://osf.io/n4p5c/.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2025.3634786
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Effects of Augmented Reality on Message Credibility When Visualizing Environmental Impacts

Pierre Dragicevic, Yvonne Jansen, Ambre Assor, Aymeric Ferron
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

Investigating the Effects of Augmented Reality on Message Credibility When Visualizing Environmental Impacts

Pierre Dragicevic, Yvonne Jansen, Ambre Assor, Aymeric Ferron
article en

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) has increasingly been used to communicate environmental impacts, offering greater engagement than conventional displays. However, its effect on message credibility-how much people believe in the content of the communication-remains unclear. In a preregistered study, we compared the perceived credibility of environmental information presented via visualizations on an AR headset or a desktop display. We created display-specific visual encodings (3D concrete for AR, 2D bar charts for desktop) and added two control conditions to cross display and encoding. We found no difference in message credibility between AR and desktop, though concrete AR was rated most engaging. Supplementary material is available at https://osf.io/n4p5c/.

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer GraphicsVol. 32(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating the Effects of Augmented Reality on Message Credibility When Visualizing Environmental Impacts — Pierre Dragicevic, Yvonne Jansen, et al. · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS