Syllabus Tone but not Faculty Gender Influences Student Perceptions of Faculty Competence, the Classroom Environment, and Belongingness

Background Syllabus tone and faculty gender can affect student perceptions, but belongingness has not been investigated. Differences in perceptions of first-generation and continuing-generation college students are also unknown. Objective We replicated prior studies manipulating syllabus tone and instructor gender on student perceptions of the professor and course engagement. We added measures of belonging and discrimination and compared responses in first-generation and continuing-generation students. Method Participants were randomly assigned to read one of four hypothetical syllabi that varied by tone and faculty gender. They completed measures of professor perceptions, engagement, sense of belonging, and anticipated discrimination. Results Participants who read the learner-centered syllabus had more positive perceptions of all constructs. There were minimal effects of faculty gender. Continuing-generation but not first-generation students expected discriminatory behavior from the professor with the teacher-centered syllabus and the female professor. Conclusion Learner-centered syllabi produced positive perceptions of faculty, increased course engagement, and a sense of belonging. Faculty gender did not affect these constructs, but there were differences based on generational status. Teaching implications The course syllabus is a powerful tool for beneficial outcomes that extend beyond the classroom.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching of Psychology
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283251397625
Primary Topic
Communication in Education and Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Syllabus Tone but not Faculty Gender Influences Student Perceptions of Faculty Competence, the Classroom Environment, and Belongingness

Amy Silvestri Hunter, Andrea Di Cataldo, Elizabeth A. McCrea, Paul Corrente et al.
Teaching of Psychology
Communication in Education and Healthcare
article

Syllabus Tone but not Faculty Gender Influences Student Perceptions of Faculty Competence, the Classroom Environment, and Belongingness

Amy Silvestri Hunter, Andrea Di Cataldo, Elizabeth A. McCrea, Paul Corrente, Madison Fruchter
article en

Abstract

Background Syllabus tone and faculty gender can affect student perceptions, but belongingness has not been investigated. Differences in perceptions of first-generation and continuing-generation college students are also unknown. Objective We replicated prior studies manipulating syllabus tone and instructor gender on student perceptions of the professor and course engagement. We added measures of belonging and discrimination and compared responses in first-generation and continuing-generation students. Method Participants were randomly assigned to read one of four hypothetical syllabi that varied by tone and faculty gender. They completed measures of professor perceptions, engagement, sense of belonging, and anticipated discrimination. Results Participants who read the learner-centered syllabus had more positive perceptions of all constructs. There were minimal effects of faculty gender. Continuing-generation but not first-generation students expected discriminatory behavior from the professor with the teacher-centered syllabus and the female professor. Conclusion Learner-centered syllabi produced positive perceptions of faculty, increased course engagement, and a sense of belonging. Faculty gender did not affect these constructs, but there were differences based on generational status. Teaching implications The course syllabus is a powerful tool for beneficial outcomes that extend beyond the classroom.

Teaching of Psychology
Seton Hall University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Communication in Education and Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.