Multisite validation of a venous thrombosis risk model in critically ill children through the CHAT Consortium

Critically ill children have a high risk of hospital associated venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE). Developing a validated risk assessment model (RAM) to identify children who may benefit from thromboprophylaxis is essential. We aimed to prospectively validate the Children's Healthcare Advancements in Thrombosis (CHAT) intensive care unit (ICU) VTE RAM containing five clinically significant variables: CVC, immobility, congenital heart disease, autoimmune or inflammatory conditions and hospital stay of ≥3 days in a multicenter cohort study. Randomly selected patients aged 0-21 years admitted to a pediatric ICU (PICU) at 32 institutions were monitored via medical record review for HA-VTE. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Calibration was assessed using calibration plots. Complete case and imputed analyses were performed and model risk scores were generated along with post-test probability. The RAM was validated in 4,674 patients with an AUROC of 0.71 [95% CI:0.64-0.78], calibration slope of 1.0 (95% CI:0.87-1.14) and intercept of 1.81x10-5 (95% CI: -5.40x10-3-5.44x10- 3). The AUROC for the imputed model was 0.69 (95% CI:0.68-0.70) with the calibration slope of 1.03 (95% CI: 0.85-1.21) and intercept of 1.22x10-3 (95% CI: -7.80x10-3-5.36x10-3). Calculated risk scores were 1 or 2 for each variable in the RAM with a total risk score ranging from 0 to 6. The estimated probability for developing HA-VTE ranged from 1% to 17.4% depending on the total score. In conclusion, the CHAT-ICU RAM has good discriminatory validity, is well-calibrated and reliably identifies children in the PICU at high and low risk of HA-VTE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2025029841
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multisite validation of a venous thrombosis risk model in critically ill children through the CHAT Consortium

Emily Krava, Guy A. Young, Amy Stillings, Neil A. Goldenberg et al.
1 citations
Blood
Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
1.77
article

Multisite validation of a venous thrombosis risk model in critically ill children through the CHAT Consortium

Emily Krava, Guy A. Young, Amy Stillings, Neil A. Goldenberg, Anthony A. Sochet, Julie Jaffray, Brian R. Branchford, E. Vincent S. Faustino, Maua Mosha, Ernest K. Amankwah, Neil A. Zakai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Critically ill children have a high risk of hospital associated venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE). Developing a validated risk assessment model (RAM) to identify children who may benefit from thromboprophylaxis is essential. We aimed to prospectively validate the Children's Healthcare Advancements in Thrombosis (CHAT) intensive care unit (ICU) VTE RAM containing five clinically significant variables: CVC, immobility, congenital heart disease, autoimmune or inflammatory conditions and hospital stay of ≥3 days in a multicenter cohort study. Randomly selected patients aged 0-21 years admitted to a pediatric ICU (PICU) at 32 institutions were monitored via medical record review for HA-VTE. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Calibration was assessed using calibration plots. Complete case and imputed analyses were performed and model risk scores were generated along with post-test probability. The RAM was validated in 4,674 patients with an AUROC of 0.71 [95% CI:0.64-0.78], calibration slope of 1.0 (95% CI:0.87-1.14) and intercept of 1.81x10-5 (95% CI: -5.40x10-3-5.44x10- 3). The AUROC for the imputed model was 0.69 (95% CI:0.68-0.70) with the calibration slope of 1.03 (95% CI: 0.85-1.21) and intercept of 1.22x10-3 (95% CI: -7.80x10-3-5.36x10-3). Calculated risk scores were 1 or 2 for each variable in the RAM with a total risk score ranging from 0 to 6. The estimated probability for developing HA-VTE ranged from 1% to 17.4% depending on the total score. In conclusion, the CHAT-ICU RAM has good discriminatory validity, is well-calibrated and reliably identifies children in the PICU at high and low risk of HA-VTE.

BloodVol. 147(8)
University of Vermont (US), University of Southern California (US), Children's Hospital of Los Angeles (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of San Diego (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Yale University (US), University of California San Diego (US), Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego (US), Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital (US), Versiti Blood Center of Wisconsin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
1.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.