The SnaFab versus the Razi antivenom for treatment of snakebite envenomation: A randomized, double-blind (investigator and victims), active controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial

Snakebite envenomation is a significant public health issue in Iran, and it is crucial to have effective and easily accessible antivenom treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of the SnaFab and the Razi antivenoms for treating snakebite envenomation. The study was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial involving 98 snakebite victims. The patients received either the SnaFab or the Razi antivenoms, with the primary endpoint being the recovery rate within 48 hours after antivenom infusion. The secondary endpoints included adverse events over a 14-day monitoring period and total antivenom consumption. The non-inferiority margin (NIM) was set at 20 percent. The study was commenced on April 17th, 2020, and concluded on May 15th, 2021. The recovery rate was 100 percent in the SnaFab group, which was non-inferior to the Razi antivenom group (98%). The mean number of antivenom units administered was 8.95 ± 4.40 units in the SnaFab group, compared to 9.04 ± 4.49 units in the Razi group (P value: 0.92). Adverse events were reported by 10.2% of individuals in the SnaFab group and 20.4% in the Razi group (p value = 0.27). Muscle weakness was the most commonly reported adverse event in the Razi group (8%), while vertigo was most frequent in the SnaFab group (4%). Moreover, there were no reports of anaphylactic shock or serum sickness. In summary, this study found that SnaFab antivenom is non-inferior to Razi antivenom for treating snakebite envenomation in Iran. Overall, the incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups, with no statistically significant differences observed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004281
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The SnaFab versus the Razi antivenom for treatment of snakebite envenomation: A randomized, double-blind (investigator and victims), active controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial

Maryam Amini Pouya, Behnaz Hedayatjoo, Mohammad Delirrad, Alireza Ghassemi Toussi et al.
1 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
1.82
article

The SnaFab versus the Razi antivenom for treatment of snakebite envenomation: A randomized, double-blind (investigator and victims), active controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial

Maryam Amini Pouya, Behnaz Hedayatjoo, Mohammad Delirrad, Alireza Ghassemi Toussi, Ali Hassan Rahmani, Hamed Hosseini, Seyyedeh Maryam Afshani, Mahdi Jannati, Mohammad Amin Ghobadi, Seyed Reza Mousavi, Mohammad reza Shahidi, Elnaz Zabihi Eidgahi, Maryam Barghbani, Seyed Reza Mousavi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Snakebite envenomation is a significant public health issue in Iran, and it is crucial to have effective and easily accessible antivenom treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of the SnaFab and the Razi antivenoms for treating snakebite envenomation. The study was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial involving 98 snakebite victims. The patients received either the SnaFab or the Razi antivenoms, with the primary endpoint being the recovery rate within 48 hours after antivenom infusion. The secondary endpoints included adverse events over a 14-day monitoring period and total antivenom consumption. The non-inferiority margin (NIM) was set at 20 percent. The study was commenced on April 17th, 2020, and concluded on May 15th, 2021. The recovery rate was 100 percent in the SnaFab group, which was non-inferior to the Razi antivenom group (98%). The mean number of antivenom units administered was 8.95 ± 4.40 units in the SnaFab group, compared to 9.04 ± 4.49 units in the Razi group (P value: 0.92). Adverse events were reported by 10.2% of individuals in the SnaFab group and 20.4% in the Razi group (p value = 0.27). Muscle weakness was the most commonly reported adverse event in the Razi group (8%), while vertigo was most frequent in the SnaFab group (4%). Moreover, there were no reports of anaphylactic shock or serum sickness. In summary, this study found that SnaFab antivenom is non-inferior to Razi antivenom for treating snakebite envenomation in Iran. Overall, the incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups, with no statistically significant differences observed.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(11)
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (IR), National Iranian Oil Company (Iran) (IR), Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch (IR), Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR), Urmia University (IR), Tehran University of Art (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.