East African Economic Order: How EEC–EAC Relations Shaped European and African Politics, 1967–77

The European Economic Community (EEC), scholars have argued, was able to maintain its imperial influence by establishing trade and aid agreements with its former African colonies. The Arusha Agreement of 1969 between the EEC and the East African Community (EAC), however, shows how European and East African officials relied on each other to strengthen political and economic positions on their respective continents. Whereas East Africans wanted to highlight the efficacity of trade agreements with partners beyond Africa, their European counterparts sought to strengthen their own position within the EEC as British membership loomed. Leaders from Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda understood the Arusha Agreement with the EEC to be an act of defiance towards the former colonizer, while EEC member states wanted to use the ties with the EAC to acquire a competitive advantage over other European states, particularly the United Kingdom. This article argues that the pursuit of an East African Economic order, which combined political independence and economic interdependence, by establishing the EEC–EAC relation, did not produce European neocolonial dominance in Africa but rather led to intra-European and intra-African competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary History
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220094251396912
Primary Topic
African history and culture studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

East African Economic Order: How EEC–EAC Relations Shaped European and African Politics, 1967–77

Frank Gerits
Journal of Contemporary History
African history and culture studies
article

East African Economic Order: How EEC–EAC Relations Shaped European and African Politics, 1967–77

Frank Gerits
article en

Abstract

The European Economic Community (EEC), scholars have argued, was able to maintain its imperial influence by establishing trade and aid agreements with its former African colonies. The Arusha Agreement of 1969 between the EEC and the East African Community (EAC), however, shows how European and East African officials relied on each other to strengthen political and economic positions on their respective continents. Whereas East Africans wanted to highlight the efficacity of trade agreements with partners beyond Africa, their European counterparts sought to strengthen their own position within the EEC as British membership loomed. Leaders from Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda understood the Arusha Agreement with the EEC to be an act of defiance towards the former colonizer, while EEC member states wanted to use the ties with the EAC to acquire a competitive advantage over other European states, particularly the United Kingdom. This article argues that the pursuit of an East African Economic order, which combined political independence and economic interdependence, by establishing the EEC–EAC relation, did not produce European neocolonial dominance in Africa but rather led to intra-European and intra-African competition.

Journal of Contemporary History
Utrecht University (NL), University of the Free State (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
African history and culture studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

East African Economic Order: How EEC–EAC Relations Shaped European and African Politics, 1967–77 — Frank Gerits · Journal of Contemporary History (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS