Interpreter‐mediated paediatric neuropsychological assessments: Clinician and interpreter experiences and consensus‐based recommendations

Interpreter-mediated assessments are increasingly common in paediatric neuropsychology, both globally and within the United Kingdom, due to the rising linguistic and cultural diversity of service users. However, limited research has examined how interpreters and clinicians navigate the complexities of delivering developmentally appropriate, culturally sensitive and psychometrically valid assessments. This qualitative study explored the experiences of 10 paediatric neuropsychologists and nine professional interpreters across NHS services in the United Kingdom. Semi-structured interviews examined the challenges, role expectations and collaborative practices within interpreter-mediated cognitive assessments. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, with key themes highlighting tensions between access and standardisation, differing interpretations of the interpreter's role and the unique demands of neuropsychological testing in children. Participants consistently emphasised the value of structured collaboration, such as pre-assessment briefings and post-assessment debriefs, though these practices were inconsistently applied. A two-round structured consensus-building exercise, informed by Delphi methodology but adapted for a smaller, profession-specific sample, was subsequently conducted with 13 participants to generate consensus-based recommendations. Nine statements reached an agreement of ≥80%, including the need for joint preparation, interpreter access to sample materials and tailored training for both interpreters and clinicians. These findings underscore the distinct cognitive, relational and linguistic challenges inherent to interpreter-mediated paediatric neuropsychological assessment and call for more explicit guidance and professional development. The study contributes to cross-cultural neuropsychology by providing practice-oriented recommendations to enhance the quality and equity of assessments. Future work should focus on implementation, particularly within resource-constrained or multilingual settings.