Gender equality in academia: how legislation against discrimination can back-fire

Systemic discrimination and structural barriers continue to hinder women’s participation in academic organizations. We address gender discrimination faced by women in academia, debating how this phenomenon persists despite advances in legislation for gender equality. This case study reflects a paradoxical reality: in a context where women are the majority, men often maintain control over positions of power. The scenario is aggravated by a dynamic of divergent values among groups, where a male minority uses a legal instrument originally designed to protect disadvantaged groups – typically women – to restrict females’ effective participation in organizational structures. The case illustrates how legislation can be instrumentalized to perpetuate men’s power and gender imbalance. It discusses how a law designed to foster gender equality in academic decision-making bodies can be subverted, contradicting its original purpose. The paper highlights the need for policies and practices that go beyond mere numerical representation, ensuring women’s access to governing bodies and decision-making structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Higher Education
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2025.2592107
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender equality in academia: how legislation against discrimination can back-fire

Chris Brewster, Benilde Oliveira, Carolina Machado, Regina Leite
Studies in Higher Education
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Gender equality in academia: how legislation against discrimination can back-fire

Chris Brewster, Benilde Oliveira, Carolina Machado, Regina Leite
article en

Abstract

Systemic discrimination and structural barriers continue to hinder women’s participation in academic organizations. We address gender discrimination faced by women in academia, debating how this phenomenon persists despite advances in legislation for gender equality. This case study reflects a paradoxical reality: in a context where women are the majority, men often maintain control over positions of power. The scenario is aggravated by a dynamic of divergent values among groups, where a male minority uses a legal instrument originally designed to protect disadvantaged groups – typically women – to restrict females’ effective participation in organizational structures. The case illustrates how legislation can be instrumentalized to perpetuate men’s power and gender imbalance. It discusses how a law designed to foster gender equality in academic decision-making bodies can be subverted, contradicting its original purpose. The paper highlights the need for policies and practices that go beyond mere numerical representation, ensuring women’s access to governing bodies and decision-making structures.

Studies in Higher Education
University of Reading (GB), University of Minho (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.