Ultrarelativistic freeze-out during reheating

We perform a thorough investigation of (ultra)relativistic freeze-out (UFO) during reheating. While the standard WIMP (nonrelativistic freeze-out) and FIMP (freeze-in) paradigms have been explored in detail during the reheating epoch, UFO has not been systematically studied, despite the fact that it is operative in a broad region of parameter space. Although dark matter (DM) is “hot” at the time of relativistic freeze-out, we show that it can easily undergo enough cooling by the time of structure formation to be compatible with <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</a:mi> <a:mi>CDM</a:mi> </a:math> . Unlike standard WIMP-like freeze-out, there can be significant out-of-equilibrium DM production after UFO, similar to the freeze-in mechanism. However, unlike freeze-in, UFO can accommodate much stronger couplings. The UFO parameter space consistent with <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <d:msub> <d:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</d:mi> <d:mi>χ</d:mi> </d:msub> <d:msup> <d:mi>h</d:mi> <d:mn>2</d:mn> </d:msup> <d:mo>=</d:mo> <d:mn>0.12</d:mn> </d:math> is quite large, with DM masses spanning about 13 orders of magnitude ( <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:msup> <g:mn>10</g:mn> <g:mrow> <g:mo>−</g:mo> <g:mn>7</g:mn> </g:mrow> </g:msup> <g:mtext> </g:mtext> <g:mtext> </g:mtext> <g:mi>GeV</g:mi> <g:mo>≲</g:mo> <g:msub> <g:mi>m</g:mi> <g:mi>χ</g:mi> </g:msub> <g:mo>≲</g:mo> <g:msup> <g:mn>10</g:mn> <g:mn>6</g:mn> </g:msup> <g:mtext> </g:mtext> <g:mtext> </g:mtext> <g:mi>GeV</g:mi> </g:math> ), reheating temperatures spanning 17 orders of magnitude ( <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:msup> <i:mn>10</i:mn> <i:mrow> <i:mo>−</i:mo> <i:mn>2</i:mn> </i:mrow> </i:msup> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mi>GeV</i:mi> <i:mo>≲</i:mo> <i:msub> <i:mi>T</i:mi> <i:mrow> <i:mi>RH</i:mi> </i:mrow> </i:msub> <i:mo>≲</i:mo> <i:msup> <i:mn>10</i:mn> <i:mn>15</i:mn> </i:msup> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mi>GeV</i:mi> </i:math> ), and beyond the Standard Model effective interaction scales spanning 11 orders of magnitude ( <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:msup> <k:mn>10</k:mn> <k:mn>3</k:mn> </k:msup> <k:mtext> </k:mtext> <k:mtext> </k:mtext> <k:mi>GeV</k:mi> <k:mo>≲</k:mo> <k:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</k:mi> <k:mo>≲</k:mo> <k:msup> <k:mn>10</k:mn> <k:mn>14</k:mn> </k:msup> <k:mtext> </k:mtext> <k:mtext> </k:mtext> <k:mi>GeV</k:mi> </k:math> ), where a thermally averaged cross section has been parametrized as <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <n:mo stretchy="false">⟨</n:mo> <n:mi>σ</n:mi> <n:mi>v</n:mi> <n:mo stretchy="false">⟩</n:mo> <n:mo>=</n:mo> <n:mfrac> <n:msup> <n:mi>T</n:mi> <n:mi>n</n:mi> </n:msup> <n:msup> <n:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</n:mi> <n:mrow> <n:mi>n</n:mi> <n:mo stretchy="false">+</n:mo> <n:mn>2</n:mn> </n:mrow> </n:msup> </n:mfrac> </n:math> . Interestingly, the most suitable range of couplings for UFO lies precisely between the typical couplings for WIMPs and FIMPs, rendering UFO quite attractive from the standpoint of detection. Particle physics models that are easily amenable to UFO include heavy vector or scalar portal interactions, along with nonrenormalizable effective interactions. Finally, we show there is a distinction between UV UFO and IR UFO, where the relic abundance for the former is sensitive to the freeze-out temperature, while the abundance for the latter is sensitive to the DM mass and the reheating temperature but insensitive to the freeze-out temperature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/6yrm-g8t2
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrarelativistic freeze-out during reheating

M. Gross, Stephen E. Henrich, Yann Mambrini, Keith A. Olive
3 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
5.61
article

Ultrarelativistic freeze-out during reheating

M. Gross, Stephen E. Henrich, Yann Mambrini, Keith A. Olive
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We perform a thorough investigation of (ultra)relativistic freeze-out (UFO) during reheating. While the standard WIMP (nonrelativistic freeze-out) and FIMP (freeze-in) paradigms have been explored in detail during the reheating epoch, UFO has not been systematically studied, despite the fact that it is operative in a broad region of parameter space. Although dark matter (DM) is “hot” at the time of relativistic freeze-out, we show that it can easily undergo enough cooling by the time of structure formation to be compatible with <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</a:mi> <a:mi>CDM</a:mi> </a:math> . Unlike standard WIMP-like freeze-out, there can be significant out-of-equilibrium DM production after UFO, similar to the freeze-in mechanism. However, unlike freeze-in, UFO can accommodate much stronger couplings. The UFO parameter space consistent with <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <d:msub> <d:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</d:mi> <d:mi>χ</d:mi> </d:msub> <d:msup> <d:mi>h</d:mi> <d:mn>2</d:mn> </d:msup> <d:mo>=</d:mo> <d:mn>0.12</d:mn> </d:math> is quite large, with DM masses spanning about 13 orders of magnitude ( <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:msup> <g:mn>10</g:mn> <g:mrow> <g:mo>−</g:mo> <g:mn>7</g:mn> </g:mrow> </g:msup> <g:mtext> </g:mtext> <g:mtext> </g:mtext> <g:mi>GeV</g:mi> <g:mo>≲</g:mo> <g:msub> <g:mi>m</g:mi> <g:mi>χ</g:mi> </g:msub> <g:mo>≲</g:mo> <g:msup> <g:mn>10</g:mn> <g:mn>6</g:mn> </g:msup> <g:mtext> </g:mtext> <g:mtext> </g:mtext> <g:mi>GeV</g:mi> </g:math> ), reheating temperatures spanning 17 orders of magnitude ( <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:msup> <i:mn>10</i:mn> <i:mrow> <i:mo>−</i:mo> <i:mn>2</i:mn> </i:mrow> </i:msup> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mi>GeV</i:mi> <i:mo>≲</i:mo> <i:msub> <i:mi>T</i:mi> <i:mrow> <i:mi>RH</i:mi> </i:mrow> </i:msub> <i:mo>≲</i:mo> <i:msup> <i:mn>10</i:mn> <i:mn>15</i:mn> </i:msup> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mtext> </i:mtext> <i:mi>GeV</i:mi> </i:math> ), and beyond the Standard Model effective interaction scales spanning 11 orders of magnitude ( <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:msup> <k:mn>10</k:mn> <k:mn>3</k:mn> </k:msup> <k:mtext> </k:mtext> <k:mtext> </k:mtext> <k:mi>GeV</k:mi> <k:mo>≲</k:mo> <k:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</k:mi> <k:mo>≲</k:mo> <k:msup> <k:mn>10</k:mn> <k:mn>14</k:mn> </k:msup> <k:mtext> </k:mtext> <k:mtext> </k:mtext> <k:mi>GeV</k:mi> </k:math> ), where a thermally averaged cross section has been parametrized as <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <n:mo stretchy="false">⟨</n:mo> <n:mi>σ</n:mi> <n:mi>v</n:mi> <n:mo stretchy="false">⟩</n:mo> <n:mo>=</n:mo> <n:mfrac> <n:msup> <n:mi>T</n:mi> <n:mi>n</n:mi> </n:msup> <n:msup> <n:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</n:mi> <n:mrow> <n:mi>n</n:mi> <n:mo stretchy="false">+</n:mo> <n:mn>2</n:mn> </n:mrow> </n:msup> </n:mfrac> </n:math> . Interestingly, the most suitable range of couplings for UFO lies precisely between the typical couplings for WIMPs and FIMPs, rendering UFO quite attractive from the standpoint of detection. Particle physics models that are easily amenable to UFO include heavy vector or scalar portal interactions, along with nonrenormalizable effective interactions. Finally, we show there is a distinction between UV UFO and IR UFO, where the relic abundance for the former is sensitive to the freeze-out temperature, while the abundance for the latter is sensitive to the DM mass and the reheating temperature but insensitive to the freeze-out temperature.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(10)
University of Minnesota (US), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), University of Minnesota System (US), Laboratoire de Physique des 2 Infinis Irène Joliot-Curie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
5.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.