AI, digital twins, and healthcare utilization behaviour: evidence from a Swiss population survey

The increasing development of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital twin technologies in healthcare raises important questions about their future acceptance. Investigating how healthcare utilization behaviour influences openness to such future digital innovations can support the design of health systems that align with utilization behaviour and expectations. A nationally representative online survey of 1,486 adults in Switzerland was conducted in 2023. Participants were categorized into five groups based on their healthcare utilization behaviour: conventional medicine users, complementary medicine users, integrative medicine users, self-treatment users, and pharmacy users. The survey assessed digital literacy, current use of digital tools, and attitudes toward AI and digital twins. Digital twin understanding was ensured through an explanatory video and comprehension checks. Weighted analyses and regression models were used to evaluate differences between groups. (no health care intervention on human participants; no requirement for trial registration or ethics approval). Across all healthcare utilization behaviour groups, the majority of participants reported a willingness to use digital twin services, with significantly higher agreement among self-treatment users. This group also demonstrated the highest digital literacy, most frequent use of health-related apps, and strongest familiarity with AI tools such as ChatGPT. They rated the potential benefits of digital twins more highly and expressed greater trust in both public and private institutions offering these services. Complementary and integrative medicine users reported lower digital literacy and were less likely to consider digital twins beneficial across domains such as cost reduction, therapy validation, and disease prediction. Conventional medicine users expressed specific concerns about digital twins replacing physicians, rated predictive features less favourably, and showed the lowest support for independent personal use of digital twins. Pharmacy users showed moderate willingness, with relatively high trust in institutions and greater appreciation for the coordination and predictive functions of digital twins. This study demonstrates that attitudes toward AI-based health technologies are closely tied to existing patterns of healthcare usage. While digital twins are generally well received, differences in acceptance highlight the need to tailor implementation strategies to specific user profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13786-3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI, digital twins, and healthcare utilization behaviour: evidence from a Swiss population survey

Markus Christen, Claudia M. Witt, Jiahui An
BMC Health Services Research
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI, digital twins, and healthcare utilization behaviour: evidence from a Swiss population survey

Markus Christen, Claudia M. Witt, Jiahui An
article en

Abstract

The increasing development of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital twin technologies in healthcare raises important questions about their future acceptance. Investigating how healthcare utilization behaviour influences openness to such future digital innovations can support the design of health systems that align with utilization behaviour and expectations. A nationally representative online survey of 1,486 adults in Switzerland was conducted in 2023. Participants were categorized into five groups based on their healthcare utilization behaviour: conventional medicine users, complementary medicine users, integrative medicine users, self-treatment users, and pharmacy users. The survey assessed digital literacy, current use of digital tools, and attitudes toward AI and digital twins. Digital twin understanding was ensured through an explanatory video and comprehension checks. Weighted analyses and regression models were used to evaluate differences between groups. (no health care intervention on human participants; no requirement for trial registration or ethics approval). Across all healthcare utilization behaviour groups, the majority of participants reported a willingness to use digital twin services, with significantly higher agreement among self-treatment users. This group also demonstrated the highest digital literacy, most frequent use of health-related apps, and strongest familiarity with AI tools such as ChatGPT. They rated the potential benefits of digital twins more highly and expressed greater trust in both public and private institutions offering these services. Complementary and integrative medicine users reported lower digital literacy and were less likely to consider digital twins beneficial across domains such as cost reduction, therapy validation, and disease prediction. Conventional medicine users expressed specific concerns about digital twins replacing physicians, rated predictive features less favourably, and showed the lowest support for independent personal use of digital twins. Pharmacy users showed moderate willingness, with relatively high trust in institutions and greater appreciation for the coordination and predictive functions of digital twins. This study demonstrates that attitudes toward AI-based health technologies are closely tied to existing patterns of healthcare usage. While digital twins are generally well received, differences in acceptance highlight the need to tailor implementation strategies to specific user profiles.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 26(1)
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH), University of Zurich (CH), ETH Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.