General practice incentives: a review of the international literature
Although blended payment models show promise, evidence for the effectiveness of models including P4P is highly variable. If adopted, careful evaluation of each incentive's impact on both quality and equity will be essential.
Authors
- Margo Barr (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3007-0216)
- Kate Marshall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7046-5773)
- Ben Harris‐Roxas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1716-2009)
- Joel Rhee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5233-2758)
- Anurag Sharma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7570-852X)
- Rania Ali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-0163)
- Anthony Paulo Sunjaya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-4374)
- Michael Kidd (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5264-9712)
- Mary Burns (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8498-1237)
- Mark Harris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0705-8913)
- Cathelijne H van Kemenade
Institutions
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- New South Wales Department of Health (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Sax Institute (AU)
- Institute for the Future (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- British Journal of General Practice
- Published
- 2025-11-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2025.0143
- Primary Topic
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Australian Government