Developing an integrated evaluation indicator system for non-communicable disease management in China’s primary care: a modified Delphi-analytic hierarchy process study based on the structure-process-outcome framework

The aging population and increasing prevalence of chronic conditions have led to higher healthcare costs and greater resource utilization globally, exerting considerable pressure on healthcare system sustainability. Integrating services in primary healthcare can improve access and effectiveness for chronic disease management. However, China’s primary healthcare institutions have not achieved full integration of essential clinical services and public health services, hindering the continuity of care and chronic disease management. Guided by the Structure- Process- Outcome framework, this study aimed to develop core indicators to evaluate the capacity of integrated noncommunicable disease services within China’s public healthcare system. A modified Delphi method was employed with 22 experts over two rounds between January and May 2025. The panel reached a consensus on key indicators for integrating clinical and preventive services in primary healthcare institutions. The Analytic Hierarchy Process was employed to determine the weight values of the indicators. A total of 78 indicators were identified, comprising 34 structural, 15 process, and 29 outcome indicators, with weight values of 0.2807, 0.2708, and 0.4485, respectively. The authority coefficient (Cr) was 0.7795. The coordination of experts’ opinions, measured by the Kendall coordination coefficient W, ranged from 0.219 to 0.246 (P < 0.01). Additionally, the consistency ratio (CR) values for each level were < 0.1. This study established a core set of indicators to evaluate the integration of clinical care and preventive services within China’s primary healthcare institutions. These indicators reflect the global health priorities of people-centered and inter-sectorally coordinated care. They support policy implementation and offer valuable insights for other countries seeking to develop or strengthen integrated primary healthcare systems in response to the growing chronic disease burden.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25714-5
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing an integrated evaluation indicator system for non-communicable disease management in China’s primary care: a modified Delphi-analytic hierarchy process study based on the structure-process-outcome framework

Yuhan Wu, Jiarui Zhang, Rui Tian, Dahai Zhao
BMC Public Health
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
article

Developing an integrated evaluation indicator system for non-communicable disease management in China’s primary care: a modified Delphi-analytic hierarchy process study based on the structure-process-outcome framework

Yuhan Wu, Jiarui Zhang, Rui Tian, Dahai Zhao
article en

Abstract

The aging population and increasing prevalence of chronic conditions have led to higher healthcare costs and greater resource utilization globally, exerting considerable pressure on healthcare system sustainability. Integrating services in primary healthcare can improve access and effectiveness for chronic disease management. However, China’s primary healthcare institutions have not achieved full integration of essential clinical services and public health services, hindering the continuity of care and chronic disease management. Guided by the Structure- Process- Outcome framework, this study aimed to develop core indicators to evaluate the capacity of integrated noncommunicable disease services within China’s public healthcare system. A modified Delphi method was employed with 22 experts over two rounds between January and May 2025. The panel reached a consensus on key indicators for integrating clinical and preventive services in primary healthcare institutions. The Analytic Hierarchy Process was employed to determine the weight values of the indicators. A total of 78 indicators were identified, comprising 34 structural, 15 process, and 29 outcome indicators, with weight values of 0.2807, 0.2708, and 0.4485, respectively. The authority coefficient (Cr) was 0.7795. The coordination of experts’ opinions, measured by the Kendall coordination coefficient W, ranged from 0.219 to 0.246 (P < 0.01). Additionally, the consistency ratio (CR) values for each level were < 0.1. This study established a core set of indicators to evaluate the integration of clinical care and preventive services within China’s primary healthcare institutions. These indicators reflect the global health priorities of people-centered and inter-sectorally coordinated care. They support policy implementation and offer valuable insights for other countries seeking to develop or strengthen integrated primary healthcare systems in response to the growing chronic disease burden.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.