Antimicrobial resistance is widespread among intestinal and extra-intestinal <i>Bacteroides fragilis</i> strains

<i>Bacteroides fragilis</i> is an important member of the human gut microbiota, where it contributes to immune modulation, intestinal barrier integrity, and colonization resistance. Despite its beneficial roles as a symbiont in the gut, <i>B. fragilis</i> is also the most commonly isolated anaerobe in clinical infections, implicated in intra-abdominal abscesses, bloodstream infections, and soft tissue infections. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is increasingly recognized as a major factor in its transition from symbiont to opportunist; however, the relationship between resistance and anatomical site of isolation remains poorly defined. Here, we compared AMR phenotypes and genotypes between intestinal and extra-intestinal <i>B. fragilis</i> isolates to assess whether clinical strains are enriched for resistance determinants. Surprisingly, we found comparable susceptibility profiles and AMR gene content between the two groups. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were broadly similar, and β-lactamase activity was detected in ~70% of the isolates regardless of the isolation site. We found that resistance genes were similarly distributed across both intestinal and clinical strains. A microbial genome-wide association study (mGWAS) confirmed the known resistance markers, such as <i>ermF</i>, <i>aadS</i>, and <i>tetQ,</i> and identified novel associations with conjugative transposons, efflux transporters, regulatory genes, and previously uncharacterized loci. These findings suggest that intestinal strains serve as a reservoir of clinically relevant resistance determinants that may be mobilized under selective pressure. Although prior work has largely focused on clinical isolates, our findings highlight the need to surveil AMR within the gut microbiota, where widespread resistance in commensal bacteria has the potential to complicate treatment of extra-intestinal infections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infection and Immunity
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00529-25
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antimicrobial resistance is widespread among intestinal and extra-intestinal Bacteroides fragilis strains

Mousumi Paulchakrabarti, Hiutung Chu, Rob Knight, Chia-Yun Hsu et al.
Infection and Immunity
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

Antimicrobial resistance is widespread among intestinal and extra-intestinal Bacteroides fragilis strains

Mousumi Paulchakrabarti, Hiutung Chu, Rob Knight, Chia-Yun Hsu, Manuela Raffatellu, Biswa Choudhury, Luke R. Loomis, Victor Nizet, David T. Pride, Michael H. Lee, Marvic Carrillo Terrazas, Renee Oles, Adriana Vasquez Ayala
article en

Abstract

<i>Bacteroides fragilis</i> is an important member of the human gut microbiota, where it contributes to immune modulation, intestinal barrier integrity, and colonization resistance. Despite its beneficial roles as a symbiont in the gut, <i>B. fragilis</i> is also the most commonly isolated anaerobe in clinical infections, implicated in intra-abdominal abscesses, bloodstream infections, and soft tissue infections. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is increasingly recognized as a major factor in its transition from symbiont to opportunist; however, the relationship between resistance and anatomical site of isolation remains poorly defined. Here, we compared AMR phenotypes and genotypes between intestinal and extra-intestinal <i>B. fragilis</i> isolates to assess whether clinical strains are enriched for resistance determinants. Surprisingly, we found comparable susceptibility profiles and AMR gene content between the two groups. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were broadly similar, and β-lactamase activity was detected in ~70% of the isolates regardless of the isolation site. We found that resistance genes were similarly distributed across both intestinal and clinical strains. A microbial genome-wide association study (mGWAS) confirmed the known resistance markers, such as <i>ermF</i>, <i>aadS</i>, and <i>tetQ,</i> and identified novel associations with conjugative transposons, efflux transporters, regulatory genes, and previously uncharacterized loci. These findings suggest that intestinal strains serve as a reservoir of clinically relevant resistance determinants that may be mobilized under selective pressure. Although prior work has largely focused on clinical isolates, our findings highlight the need to surveil AMR within the gut microbiota, where widespread resistance in commensal bacteria has the potential to complicate treatment of extra-intestinal infections.

Infection and ImmunityVol. 93(12)
University of San Diego (US), UC San Diego Health System (US), University of California San Diego (US), Bioanalytica (Switzerland) (CH), Innovative Clinical Research (US), La Jolla Bioengineering Institute (US), University of Montana (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.