Primary closure versus secondary healing of pin sites after the removal of provisional external fixator: a systematic review and meta-analysis
This meta-analysis demonstrated that primary closure of pin sites was associated with a lower risk of infection compared with secondary healing, based on studies with a maximum external fixation duration of 21 days. However, future well-designed, homogeneous research is needed to better understand the impact of these two wound management approaches on pin site infections.
Authors
- Hamed Tayyebi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5003-0118)
- Niloofar Dehghan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5180-4311)
- Michael David McKee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4306-4090)
Institutions
- University of Arizona (US)
- University of Phoenix (US)
- The Core Institute (US)
- Phoenix College (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Published
- 2025-11-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09288-2
- Primary Topic
- Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00