Tiny brands, big challenges: The limits of loyalty and the role of penetration in driving growth

• In some categories, tiny brands are numerous. • Tiny brands are volatile, frequently fail, and often exhibit loyalty deficits. • When tiny brands grow, this is mostly via penetration, challenging niche loyalty views. • Tiny brands should be managed like big brands, within resource limits. Tiny brands – those with <1 % market share – have been overlooked in marketing research. Consequently, we know little about their brand performance metrics or growth patterns. This study examines whether tiny brands exhibit niche-like excess loyalty, and compares their market performance over five years, focusing on changes in market share and buyer behaviour. Findings show that even stable tiny brands have generally low levels of loyalty, often lower than expected (deficit loyalty). When tiny brands grow, their sales gains come primarily from increased penetration rather than purchase frequency. This challenges the idea that tiny brands depend on niche loyalty strategies. Instead, it highlights the importance of broad customer acquisition, even for the tiniest of brands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Research
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115864
Primary Topic
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tiny brands, big challenges: The limits of loyalty and the role of penetration in driving growth

Steven Dunn, Alicia Barker-Trowse, Armando Maria Corsi, Byron Sharp et al.
Journal of Business Research
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
article

Tiny brands, big challenges: The limits of loyalty and the role of penetration in driving growth

Steven Dunn, Alicia Barker-Trowse, Armando Maria Corsi, Byron Sharp, Charles Graham
article en

Abstract

• In some categories, tiny brands are numerous. • Tiny brands are volatile, frequently fail, and often exhibit loyalty deficits. • When tiny brands grow, this is mostly via penetration, challenging niche loyalty views. • Tiny brands should be managed like big brands, within resource limits. Tiny brands – those with <1 % market share – have been overlooked in marketing research. Consequently, we know little about their brand performance metrics or growth patterns. This study examines whether tiny brands exhibit niche-like excess loyalty, and compares their market performance over five years, focusing on changes in market share and buyer behaviour. Findings show that even stable tiny brands have generally low levels of loyalty, often lower than expected (deficit loyalty). When tiny brands grow, their sales gains come primarily from increased penetration rather than purchase frequency. This challenges the idea that tiny brands depend on niche loyalty strategies. Instead, it highlights the importance of broad customer acquisition, even for the tiniest of brands.

Journal of Business ResearchVol. 204
University of South Australia (AU), London South Bank University (GB), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tiny brands, big challenges: The limits of loyalty and the role of penetration in driving growth — Steven Dunn, Alicia Barker-Trowse, et al. · Journal of Business Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS