State-of-the-Art Analysis of U.S. Flight Event and Surveillance Data Coverage and Future Research Directions

The Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast mandate, along with advances in government and third-party flight tracking systems, has allowed researchers to analyze aspects of aviation operations that were not possible beforehand. The purpose of this study is to provide: 1) a summary of flight event data available to the public, 2) a comparison of application programming interface surveillance data available in the U.S., and 3) an evaluation of flight coverage across the data sources. This analysis considers the FAA’s Aviation System Performance Metrics, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics’ Airline Service Quality Performance System, the Official Airline Guide’s On-Time Performance Flight dataset, the FAA’s System Wide Information Management (SWIM), and the OpenSky Network (OSN). It reports the spatial and market segment (i.e., commercial, general aviation, air cargo) coverage, helping researchers identify the appropriate dataset for their studies. This study found that OSN has worldwide coverage of enroute flights, with limited airport surface movement. FAA’s SWIM contains several surveillance datasets, two enroute (only one includes Alaska and Hawaii), and one airport surface datasets. Combining sources allows one source to overcome a spatial limitation of another to generate a complete trajectory. The flight counts by source are reported with a discussion of their discrepancies, where surveillance sources do not capture all flights from the flight event datasets and vice versa. Therefore, surveillance should be considered supplemental and not a replacement for measuring flight counts. This paper then discusses future research directions, given surveillance availability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981251378487
Primary Topic
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State-of-the-Art Analysis of U.S. Flight Event and Surveillance Data Coverage and Future Research Directions

Susan Hotle, Kyle Sorlie Titlow, Ed Strocko, Mehdi Hashemipour
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
article

State-of-the-Art Analysis of U.S. Flight Event and Surveillance Data Coverage and Future Research Directions

Susan Hotle, Kyle Sorlie Titlow, Ed Strocko, Mehdi Hashemipour
article en

Abstract

The Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast mandate, along with advances in government and third-party flight tracking systems, has allowed researchers to analyze aspects of aviation operations that were not possible beforehand. The purpose of this study is to provide: 1) a summary of flight event data available to the public, 2) a comparison of application programming interface surveillance data available in the U.S., and 3) an evaluation of flight coverage across the data sources. This analysis considers the FAA’s Aviation System Performance Metrics, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics’ Airline Service Quality Performance System, the Official Airline Guide’s On-Time Performance Flight dataset, the FAA’s System Wide Information Management (SWIM), and the OpenSky Network (OSN). It reports the spatial and market segment (i.e., commercial, general aviation, air cargo) coverage, helping researchers identify the appropriate dataset for their studies. This study found that OSN has worldwide coverage of enroute flights, with limited airport surface movement. FAA’s SWIM contains several surveillance datasets, two enroute (only one includes Alaska and Hawaii), and one airport surface datasets. Combining sources allows one source to overcome a spatial limitation of another to generate a complete trajectory. The flight counts by source are reported with a discussion of their discrepancies, where surveillance sources do not capture all flights from the flight event datasets and vice versa. Therefore, surveillance should be considered supplemental and not a replacement for measuring flight counts. This paper then discusses future research directions, given surveillance availability.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
United States Department of Transportation (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

State-of-the-Art Analysis of U.S. Flight Event and Surveillance Data Coverage and Future Research Directions — Susan Hotle, Kyle Sorlie Titlow, et al. · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS