Adapting Post‐Milan Systemic Practice to People With an Intellectual Disability Who Have Offended: A Case Study in Systemic Hypothesising
ABSTRACT Systemic family therapy has a long history including the pioneering work of the Milan School in the 1970s and developing into post‐Milan with further integration with the dialogical approach since this time. This paper documents the adaptation of the post‐Milan method to complex case reviews in the field of youth forensic cognitive impairment. The aim was to support care teams working with people with cognitive impairment who have offended, including violence and sexual offending, focusing on enhancing their understanding of relational processes, to enhance community safety, support the amelioration of behaviour and support the care teams themselves. This article is written for family therapists interested in forensic work, forensic professionals who have had little prior exposure to systemic practice and those who support people with cognitive impairment involved in the justice system.
Authors
- Monique Frize
- Paul Rhodes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9078-0837)
- Mark R. McGowan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-5853)
- Melissa Bortolin
- Vanessa Delle‐Vergini
- Sarah Fritsche
Institutions
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Families USA (US)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Youth & Family Services (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy
- Published
- 2025-11-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.70031
- Primary Topic
- Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00