Seeing Discrimination: How Different Definitions of Discrimination Relate to Health in U.S. Adults

Research demonstrates that perceived discrimination negatively impacts health. Yet there is conflicting evidence about how an individual's definition of discrimination-separate from their experience of discrimination-shapes health disparities. Using a nationally representative survey experiment in which participants (N = 2,000) are asked to evaluate nine different scenarios of potential discrimination, we find that how a person labels these discrimination scenarios is significantly related to their self-rated health, even after controlling for sociodemographic factors. U.S. adults who are more likely to label the event as discrimination in cases where it is intentional have comparatively worse self-rated health, whereas those who are more likely to label discrimination in cases where it affects more powerful groups (White people, men, and the wealthy) have comparatively better self-rated health-even though they are not experiencing the discrimination themselves. We argue that these findings have important implications for how health researchers measure discrimination's health effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00221465251386416
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seeing Discrimination: How Different Definitions of Discrimination Relate to Health in U.S. Adults

Lauren Valentino, Evangeline Warren
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Seeing Discrimination: How Different Definitions of Discrimination Relate to Health in U.S. Adults

Lauren Valentino, Evangeline Warren
article en

Abstract

Research demonstrates that perceived discrimination negatively impacts health. Yet there is conflicting evidence about how an individual's definition of discrimination-separate from their experience of discrimination-shapes health disparities. Using a nationally representative survey experiment in which participants (N = 2,000) are asked to evaluate nine different scenarios of potential discrimination, we find that how a person labels these discrimination scenarios is significantly related to their self-rated health, even after controlling for sociodemographic factors. U.S. adults who are more likely to label the event as discrimination in cases where it is intentional have comparatively worse self-rated health, whereas those who are more likely to label discrimination in cases where it affects more powerful groups (White people, men, and the wealthy) have comparatively better self-rated health-even though they are not experiencing the discrimination themselves. We argue that these findings have important implications for how health researchers measure discrimination's health effects.

Journal of Health and Social Behavior
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.