A Pre-Screening Tool to Assess Dog Suitability for Animal-Assisted Interventions: Preliminary Results for Dog-Suitability Tests (SuiTe)

Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) or Services (AAS) may cause stress in participating dogs, making the selection of suitable individuals essential to prevent strain. Different non-standardized approaches currently exist to assess dogs' suitability for AAIs. This preliminary study aimed at evaluating two combined tools, a behavioural aptitude test (<i>SuiTe</i>) and an ad hoc revised questionnaire incorporating C-BARQ, for pre-screening dog suitability for AAIs, also in relation to salivary cortisol measured by enzyme immunoassay in <i>N</i> = 38 dogs. Dogs' behavioural responses to environmental and social stimuli were scored on an X-Y scale and classified by two independent evaluators as suitable (S), pending suitability (P), or unsuitable (U). Non-parametric tests were performed (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Results indicated significant differences between dogs classified as S or P versus U, both in <i>SuiTe</i> valence scores (higher in S and P) and in separation, attachment, and fear/anxiety behaviours assessed by the questionnaire (higher in U). However, suitability in the <i>SuiTe</i> was lower than that assessed by caregivers through an open question. Our study highlights the complexity of this assessment and the limited awareness of caregivers regarding the situations their dogs face every day. Future analyses will refine this multiparametric approach within a One Welfare perspective, ensuring the welfare of both animals and humans involved in AAIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Sciences
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12121110
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Pre-Screening Tool to Assess Dog Suitability for Animal-Assisted Interventions: Preliminary Results for Dog-Suitability Tests (SuiTe)

Chiara Mariti, Giacomo Riggio, Carmen Borrelli, Giulia Russo et al.
1 citations
Veterinary Sciences
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
article

A Pre-Screening Tool to Assess Dog Suitability for Animal-Assisted Interventions: Preliminary Results for Dog-Suitability Tests (SuiTe)

Chiara Mariti, Giacomo Riggio, Carmen Borrelli, Giulia Russo, Elisa Rosson, Matilde Bentivoglio
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) or Services (AAS) may cause stress in participating dogs, making the selection of suitable individuals essential to prevent strain. Different non-standardized approaches currently exist to assess dogs' suitability for AAIs. This preliminary study aimed at evaluating two combined tools, a behavioural aptitude test (<i>SuiTe</i>) and an ad hoc revised questionnaire incorporating C-BARQ, for pre-screening dog suitability for AAIs, also in relation to salivary cortisol measured by enzyme immunoassay in <i>N</i> = 38 dogs. Dogs' behavioural responses to environmental and social stimuli were scored on an X-Y scale and classified by two independent evaluators as suitable (S), pending suitability (P), or unsuitable (U). Non-parametric tests were performed (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Results indicated significant differences between dogs classified as S or P versus U, both in <i>SuiTe</i> valence scores (higher in S and P) and in separation, attachment, and fear/anxiety behaviours assessed by the questionnaire (higher in U). However, suitability in the <i>SuiTe</i> was lower than that assessed by caregivers through an open question. Our study highlights the complexity of this assessment and the limited awareness of caregivers regarding the situations their dogs face every day. Future analyses will refine this multiparametric approach within a One Welfare perspective, ensuring the welfare of both animals and humans involved in AAIs.

Veterinary SciencesVol. 12(12)
University of Pisa (IT), Associação Brasileira de Oncologia Veterinária (BR)
Università di Pisa
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.