Evaluating the Effects of Overburden Stress on Soil Liquefaction: Insights from Cyclic Test Data

This study investigates the effect of overburden stress (effective confining stress) on liquefaction triggering using the largest cyclic test dataset ever applied to this crucial topic. The dataset includes 225 overburden stress correction factor (Kσ) values derived from a wide range of confining stresses, relative densities, and fine contents. Our analysis reveals that specimen preparation methods, particularly tamping and compaction, significantly affect Kσ values. Compaction stresses due to tamping and compaction induce an overconsolidation ratio that changes with confining pressure, which may produce a larger apparent effect of confining pressure on Kσ. We propose a new model for estimating Kσ for clean, normally consolidated sands, which shows less dependence on confining pressure and relative density than existing models. The effect of fines content on Kσ could not be isolated from other effects because fine-grained specimens in prior research were generally prepared using tamping and compaction methods. The proposed Kσ model is intended to isolate the effect of overburden stress, enabling its use in liquefaction triggering models where different effects are accounted for by distinct correction factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jggefk.gteng-14057
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Effects of Overburden Stress on Soil Liquefaction: Insights from Cyclic Test Data

Paolo Zimmaro, Kristin J. Ulmer, Kenneth S. Hudson, Scott J. Brandenberg et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
0.95
article

Evaluating the Effects of Overburden Stress on Soil Liquefaction: Insights from Cyclic Test Data

Paolo Zimmaro, Kristin J. Ulmer, Kenneth S. Hudson, Scott J. Brandenberg, Brian Carlton, Jonathan P. Stewart, Steven L. Kramer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of overburden stress (effective confining stress) on liquefaction triggering using the largest cyclic test dataset ever applied to this crucial topic. The dataset includes 225 overburden stress correction factor (Kσ) values derived from a wide range of confining stresses, relative densities, and fine contents. Our analysis reveals that specimen preparation methods, particularly tamping and compaction, significantly affect Kσ values. Compaction stresses due to tamping and compaction induce an overconsolidation ratio that changes with confining pressure, which may produce a larger apparent effect of confining pressure on Kσ. We propose a new model for estimating Kσ for clean, normally consolidated sands, which shows less dependence on confining pressure and relative density than existing models. The effect of fines content on Kσ could not be isolated from other effects because fine-grained specimens in prior research were generally prepared using tamping and compaction methods. The proposed Kσ model is intended to isolate the effect of overburden stress, enabling its use in liquefaction triggering models where different effects are accounted for by distinct correction factors.

Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental EngineeringVol. 152(2)
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NO), Southwest Research Institute (US), Hudson Institute (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Washington (US), Institute of Geotechnics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), University of Calabria (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.